Re JA (Child Abduction: Non-Convention Country)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1998 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Re J (A Child) (Custody rights; Jurisdiction)
...of Appeal. One view is encapsulated in the judgment of Lord Justice Ward in the case of Re JA (Child Abduction: Non-Convention Country) [1998] 1 FLR 231, the other in the judgment of Lord Justice Thorpe in the case of Osman v Elasha [2000] Fam 62. 15 In Re JA, at pp 241-3, Lord Justice War......
-
Hanna Panton (Lisa) v Panton (David)
...be preserved, in the event that the child is summarily returned. This cautionary condition was stated by Ward, L.J. in In Re JA (Child Abduction: Non-Convention Country) [1998] 1 FLR 231, at page 241. He said: "... the court cannot be satisfied that it is in the best interests of the child......
-
K v D
...1283 the learned Judge stated: "As Ward LJ points out in the passage I have cited in Re JA (Child Abduction: Non-Conveniens Country) [1998] 1 FLR 231, 234 the principle of forum conveniens as the concept is used in other kinds of litigation has no place in the wardship jurisdiction and thus......
-
J (A Child) (2004)
...right to apply to relocate was crucial to the refusal of a return order in the case of Re JA (Child Abduction: non-Convention country) [1998] 1FLR231 and, finally, that there is no reported case of a return order that would lock the mother into the foreign jurisdiction without a right of ap......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Child abduction and non-convention countries: a comparative analysis -England and Australia
...direct knowledge of the conditions prevailing in the place where children ordinarily have their home is able to make the decision. 40 38 [1998] 1 FLR 231. 39 Ibid at 234. 40 Ward LJ, ibid, however commented that the only reason for returning a child without After an analysis of the trial ju......