Re Jauncey. Bird v Arnold

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1926
Year1926
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • UMBC v Pekeliling Triangle Sdn. Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Girvan (Inspector of Taxes) v Orange Personal Communications Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 3 d5 Abril d5 1998
    ...52 TC 307 IR Commrs v Duke of WestminsterELR [1936] AC 1 IR Commrs v McGuckian TAXWLR[1997] BTC 346; [1997] 1 WLR 991 Jauncey, ReELR [1926] Ch 471M Leigh v IR CommrsTAX (1927) 11 TC 590 Parkside Leasing Ltd v Smith (HMIT) TAX[1985] BTC 25 Paton (as Fenton's Trustee) v IR CommrsTAX (1938) 21......
  • Standard Bank of SA Ltd v Oneanate Investments (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Rapp and Maister v Aronovsky 1943 WLD 68 Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle [1948] Ch 465 ([1948] 2 All ER 318 (CA)) Re Jauncey, Bird v Arnold [1926] Ch 471 Re Morris; Mayhew v Halton [1922] 1 Ch 126 J Reddie v Williamson (1863) 1 Macph 228 (Ct of Sess) 1995 (4) SA p517 A Reuter v Yates 1904 TS 8......
  • Cooper v Critchley
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 d5 Janeiro d5 1955
    ...within Section 77 of the Fines and Recoveries Act". 51 there was a somewhat similar decision under the Real Property Limitation Act in In re Jauncey. reported in 1926 Chancery Division, page 471. 52 there is thus authority - not. It is true, relating to this particular Act - for the proposi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT