Re JS (A Child) (Disposal of body)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] EWHC 2859 (Fam) |
| Date | 2016 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Gloucestershire County Council v Re K
...may not be able to obtain an injunction for delivery of the body before the grant of letters of administration (see Dobson)." 6 In Re JS (disposal of body) [2016] EWHC 2859 (Fam) Peter Jackson J observed: "47. The law in relation to the disposition of a dead body emanates from the decision ......
-
Re S (Child as parent: Adoption: Consent)
...her current carers as adopters (see generally on this Re A (Children) (Adoption: Scottish Children's Hearing) [2017] EWHC 1293 (Fam); [2017] 4 W.L.R. 1), there are two likely difficulties in that approach i) There is an argument that T was placed with the foster-to-adopt carers straight fr......
-
Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and Another v Robin Makin and Others
...New Zealand Supreme Court in Takamoresupra. I am conscious that Jackson J in In re JS (A Child) (Disposal of Body: Prospective Orders) [2017] 4 WLR 1 reached a different conclusion, in reliance on Ansteysupra at paragraphs 47–9, but he was not concerned with a situation even remotely simila......
-
Monalisa Veronica Walker v Deno Alexander Smith Jr
...of the body to arrange for proper disposal: Williams v Williams [1881] 20 Ch. D. 659, Buchanan v Milton [1999] 2 FLR 844 and Re JS [2017] 4 WLR 1. Both mother and father are entitled to a grant of administration under Rule 22 of the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1978, the father qualifying......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Frozen Corpses and Feuding Parents: Re JS (Disposal of Body)
...Queen’s University Belfast. Thanks to the anonymous referee for their commentson the original submission.1Re JS (Disposal of Body) [2016] EWHC 2859 (Fam) (Re JS). The judgment had three parts: thefirst, determining the application and subject to an initial reporting restriction (to avoid any......