Re K (Abduction: Consent)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Year | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
58 cases
-
S (A) v S(C)
...EX PARTE SHAH (NILISH) 1983 2 AC 309 1983 2 WLR 16 1983 1 AER 226 MARK v MARK 2006 1 AC 98 2005 3 WLR 111 K (ABDUCTION: CONSENT), IN RE 1997 2 FLR 212 1998 1 FCR 311 R (ABDUCTION: HABITUAL RESIDENCE), IN RE 2004 1 FLR 216 2004 34 FAM LAW 8 AL HABTOOR v FOTHERINGHAM 2001 1 FLR 951 2001 1 FCR......
-
L.B. v A.H.
...and relies in part on historic discussions or agreements in respect of hypothetical situations. 5.5 In Re K (Abduction: Consent) [1997] 2 FLR 212, the High Court of England and Wales held that consent to removal must be positive, unequivocal, clear and cogent: the Applicant has offered an u......
-
S.R v M.M.R
...court should consider from welfare basis where interests of children lie - B v B [1998] 1 IR 299; In Re K (Abduction:Consent) [1997] 2 FLR 212; RK v JK (Child Abduction: Acquiescence) [2000] 2 IR 416and In Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)[1998] AC 72 followed - Minister for Justice v C(V) (U......
-
Re G and A (Abduction: Consent)
...intended to and did give unconditional consent to the removal of the child (see P v P [1998] 2 FLR 835 12 and Re K (Abduction: Consent) [1997] 2 FLR 212. A similar test applies for acquiescence. (3) Whilst there must be positive and unequivocal giving of consent, it need not be given in wri......
Get Started for Free
