Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Re Konigsberg (A Brankrupt)

Weekly Law Reports Cited in 48 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1989
Year1989
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
39 cases
  • BBGP Managing General Partner Ltd v Babcock & Brown Global Partners
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 August 2010
    ...Mood & R 182; Perry v Smith (1842) M&W 681; Shore v Bedford (1843) 5 Man & Gex 271; Ross v Gibbs (1869) LR 8 Eq 522 and Re Koenigsberg [1989] 3 All ER 289. (I note that there is no question here of a separate and exclusive retainer of Slaughter and May by some only of the joint clients). I ......
  • Gelatissimo Ventures (S) Pte Ltd and Others v Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 October 2009
    ...thread was owned jointly by the plaintiffs and could only be waived if all of them agreed to do so. (see Re Konigsberg (A Bankrupt)[1989] 1 WLR 1257; The Sagheera [1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 18 In this case, it was not clear whether Jawahar intended to waive the privilege in the email thread when......
  • Lavallee, Rackel and Heintz et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), (1998) 218 A.R. 229 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 June 1998
    ...68; 43 N.R. 361; 30 C.R.(3d) 289, refd to. [para. 14]. Canada v. Ng (1989), 97 A.R. 241 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14]. Konigsberg, Re, [1989] 3 All E.R. 289, refd to. [para. R. v. Leibel (R.J.), [1993] 7 W.W.R. 407; 111 Sask.R. 107 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Giguere (1978), 44 C.C.C.(......
  • Ranjeet Singh Sidhu v Zavarco Plc
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2016
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • ADMISSIBILITY, PRIVILEGE AND THE EXPUNGING OF EVIDENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...for a party to give evidence of a privileged matter if he holds the privilege jointly with his opponent: In re Kronigsberg (A Bankrupt)[1989] 1 WLR 1257. 38 More may be revealed as the law develops. 39 Principally his lawyer and, in certain cases, a third party: Supra, note 20. 40 This is s......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT