Re Lewis. ex parte Munro
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1875 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Sweeney v Mulcahy
...SIOBHAN MULCAHY DEFENDANT Citations: ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S5 ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S2 CAERLEON TINPLATE CO V HUGHES 60 LJQB 640 LEWIS, IN RE 1 QBD 724 ATTORNEYS & SOLICITORS ACT 1870 S4 BAKER V YORKSHIRE FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CO 1892 1 QB 144 ARBITRATION ACT 1889 S27 HICKMAN V KENT OF ROMN......
-
Sweeney v Mulcahy
...|Sweeney v. Mulcahy| Citations: ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S5 ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S2 CAERLEON TINPLATE CO V HUGHES 60 LJQB 640 LEWIS, IN RE 1 QBD 724 ATTORNEYS & SOLICITORS ACT 1870 S4 BAKER V YORKSHIRE FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CO 1892 1 QB 144 ARBITRATION ACT 1889 S27 HICKMAN V KENT OF ROMNEY MA......
-
Mong Man Wai v H H Lau & Co (A Firm
...business agreement strictly. Both the solicitor and client had to sign the agreement, otherwise it would be invalid: see Re Lewis (1875-76) 1 QBD 724; Re Raven (1881) 45 LT 742; Pontifex v. Farnham (1892) 62 LJQB 344. Subsequently, a line of cases appeared which relaxed the strict formality......
-
United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd v L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd
...were ad idem, yet there was no submission under the Act unless there were an agreement in writing by both parties. Re Lewis; ex p Munro [(1876) 1 QBD 724] is conclusive on this The case establishes that in some cases where the intention to be bound by an arbitration clause can be manifested......
Request a trial to view additional results