Re Lewis. ex parte Munro
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Divisional Court |
| Year | 1875 |
| Date | 1875 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Re Thompson. ex parte Baylis
... ... 41 of 6 & 7 Vict. c. 73 ... Dictum in In re Lewis, Ex parte Munro (1 Q.B. D. 724) disapproved ... APPEAL by a solicitor against an order for the taxation of a bill of costs referred to the Court by ... ...
-
Sweeney v Mulcahy
...SIOBHAN MULCAHY DEFENDANT Citations: ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S5 ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S2 CAERLEON TINPLATE CO V HUGHES 60 LJQB 640 LEWIS, IN RE 1 QBD 724 ATTORNEYS & SOLICITORS ACT 1870 S4 BAKER V YORKSHIRE FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CO 1892 1 QB 144 ARBITRATION ACT 1889 S27 HICKMAN V KENT OF ROMN......
-
Sweeney v Mulcahy
...|Sweeney v. Mulcahy| Citations: ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S5 ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S2 CAERLEON TINPLATE CO V HUGHES 60 LJQB 640 LEWIS, IN RE 1 QBD 724 ATTORNEYS & SOLICITORS ACT 1870 S4 BAKER V YORKSHIRE FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CO 1892 1 QB 144 ARBITRATION ACT 1889 S27 HICKMAN V KENT OF ROMNEY MA......
-
Mong Man Wai v H H Lau & Co (A Firm
...business agreement strictly. Both the solicitor and client had to sign the agreement, otherwise it would be invalid: see Re Lewis (1875-76) 1 QBD 724; Re Raven (1881) 45 LT 742; Pontifex v. Farnham (1892) 62 LJQB 344. Subsequently, a line of cases appeared which relaxed the strict formality......
Get Started for Free