Re Lewis. ex parte Munro

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1875
Date1875

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Re Thompson. ex parte Baylis
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 41 of 6 & 7 Vict. c. 73 ... Dictum in In re Lewis, Ex parte Munro (1 Q.B. D. 724) disapproved ... APPEAL by a solicitor against an order for the taxation of a bill of costs referred to the Court by ... ...
  • Sweeney v Mulcahy
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1993
    ...SIOBHAN MULCAHY DEFENDANT Citations: ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S5 ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S2 CAERLEON TINPLATE CO V HUGHES 60 LJQB 640 LEWIS, IN RE 1 QBD 724 ATTORNEYS & SOLICITORS ACT 1870 S4 BAKER V YORKSHIRE FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CO 1892 1 QB 144 ARBITRATION ACT 1889 S27 HICKMAN V KENT OF ROMN......
  • Sweeney v Mulcahy
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1993
    ...|Sweeney v. Mulcahy| Citations: ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S5 ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S2 CAERLEON TINPLATE CO V HUGHES 60 LJQB 640 LEWIS, IN RE 1 QBD 724 ATTORNEYS & SOLICITORS ACT 1870 S4 BAKER V YORKSHIRE FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CO 1892 1 QB 144 ARBITRATION ACT 1889 S27 HICKMAN V KENT OF ROMNEY MA......
  • Mong Man Wai v H H Lau & Co (A Firm
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 30 May 2003
    ...business agreement strictly. Both the solicitor and client had to sign the agreement, otherwise it would be invalid: see Re Lewis (1875-76) 1 QBD 724; Re Raven (1881) 45 LT 742; Pontifex v. Farnham (1892) 62 LJQB 344. Subsequently, a line of cases appeared which relaxed the strict formality......
  • Get Started for Free