Re Lomax Leisure Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1999
Year1999
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Discovery (Northampton) Ltd v Debenhams Retail Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 19 September 2019
    ...Razzak v Pala [1997] 1 WLR 1336 at 1341–3 per Lightman J; Re Park Air Services ( supra) at p186 per Lord Millett; Re Lomax Leisure Ltd [2000] Ch 502 at 510–517 per Neuberger J, and Thomas v Ken Thomas ( supra) at 91 The question is whether a CVA can deal with such a property right. In my j......
  • Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd and Others (Applicants/Claimants) v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd ((in Administration)) and Others (Respondents/Defendants)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 28 March 2012
  • Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 October 2006
    ...a secure creditor, that is now seen to be wrong — see Razzaq v Pala [1997] 1 WLR 1336 1341(e) -1343(d) and Re Lomax Leisure Ltd [2000] Ch 502 at 510(b) -517(d). It does not seem as if the legislature intended a creditor with a right to forfeit should be treated in a different or better posi......
  • Chen Lu Kuei 對 Luo Xing Juan Angela
    • Hong Kong
    • District Court (Hong Kong)
    • 15 December 2015
    ...Orakpo [1977] 1 QB 260; Razzaq v Pala and Another [1997] 1 WLR 1336; Re Lomax Leisure Ltd [2000] Ch 502。 16. 17. 至於有關欠繳租金及中間收益等金錢的申索,原告人已知會破產管理署,並會向破產管理署證明該「可證債項」。原告人將這方面的申索申請押後審訊,好讓原告人能與破產管理署進行協商。若須要繼續訴訟的話,原告人亦向本席申請...
  • Get Started for Free