Re Lomax Leisure Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1999 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
- Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd and Others (Applicants/Claimants) v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd ((in Administration)) and Others (Respondents/Defendants)
-
Discovery (Northampton) Ltd v Debenhams Retail Ltd
...at 267 per Shaw LJ; Razzak v Pala [1997] 1 WLR 1336 at 1341–3 per Lightman J; Re Park Air Services ( supra) at p186 per Lord Millett; Re Lomax Leisure Ltd [2000] Ch 502 at 510–517 per Neuberger J, and Thomas v Ken Thomas ( supra) at 91 The question is whether a CVA can deal with such a pr......
-
Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
...for these purposes as a secure creditor, that is now seen to be wrong — see Razzaq v Pala [1997] 1 WLR 1336 1341(e) -1343(d) and Re Lomax Leisure Ltd [2000] Ch 502 at 510(b) -517(d). It does not seem as if the legislature intended a creditor with a right to forfeit should be treated in a ......
-
Chen Lu Kuei 對 Luo Xing Juan Angela
...Orakpo [1977] 1 QB 260; Razzaq v Pala and Another [1997] 1 WLR 1336; Re Lomax Leisure Ltd [2000] Ch 502。 16. 17. 至於有關欠繳租金及中間收益等金錢的申索,原告人已知會破產管理署,並會向破產管理署證明該「可證債項」。原告人將這方面的申索申請押後審訊,好讓原告人能與破產管理署進行協商。若須要繼續訴訟的話,原告人亦向本席申請...
Request a trial to view additional results