Re Londonderry's Settlement; Peat v Walsh

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1964
Year1964
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
142 cases
  • Infoline Sdn Bhd v Benjamin Lim Keong Hoe
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Lemos v Coutts (Cayman) Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 9 August 1993
    ...Lord Wilberforce applied. (13) Ker v. WauchopeENR(1819), 1 Bligh P.C. 1; 4 E.R. 1. (14) Londonderry”s Settlement, In re, Peat v. Walsh, [1965] Ch. 918; [1964] 3 All E.R. 855, dicta of Harman, Danckwerts and Salmon, L.JJ. applied. (15) McHenry v. LewisELR(1882), 22 Ch. D. 397, dicta of Bowen......
  • Re Lemos Trust Settlement
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 22 January 1992
    ...Cases cited: (1) Cowin, In reELR(1886), 33 Ch. D. 179; 56 L.J. Ch. 78, dicta of North J. applied. (2) Londonderry”s Settlement, In re, [1965] Ch. 918; [1964] 3 All E.R. 855, dicta of Danckwerts, L.J. applied. (3) Morice v. Durham (Bishop of )(1804), 9 Ves. 399; 32 E.R. 656; [1803–13] All E.......
  • Re Ojjeh Trust
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 2 June 1993
    ...J. applied. (5) Lemos v. Coutts & Co. (Cayman) Ltd., Cause No. 425/91, April 19th, 1993, unreported. (6) Londonderry”s Settlement, In re, [1965] Ch. 918; [1964] 3 All E.R. 855, dicta of Salmon, L.J. applied. (7) Malone v. Metropolitan Police Commr., [1979] Ch. 344; [1979] 2 All E.R. 620, ob......
  • Get Started for Free
6 firm's commentaries
  • Letters Of Wishes: Adequate Deliberations
    • Bermuda
    • Mondaq Bermuda
    • 27 October 2014
    ...3 June 2014. Pitt v Holt, Futter v Futter [2013] 2 A.C. 108. [1965] Ch 918. ibid [1998] Ch 512. Edge v Pensions Ombudsman (C.A.) [2000] Ch 602, 627. See (n 10) 536. For earlier formulations, see: In Re Hastings Bass [1975] 1 Ch 25, 41; Harris v Lord Shuttleworth [1994] I.C.R. 991, 999; Wild......
  • Proposed Amendments To The Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984: A Commentary
    • Jersey
    • Mondaq Jersey
    • 15 August 2016
    ...to enter into such an arrangement can legitimately be withheld from the beneficiaries under the principles in Re Londonderry Settlement [1965] Ch 918 andRe Rabaiotti (2000) JLR Recent litigation which Baker & Partners has been involved in concerned multiple egregious examples of a corpo......
  • Supreme Court Evaluates Scope Of Trustees' Protection In Contentious Trust Litigation
    • Bahamas
    • Mondaq Bahamas
    • 19 October 2020
    ...from the beneficiary's proprietary right to obtain documents as set out in the trust cases leading up to Re Londonderry's Settlement ([1965] Ch 918). Schmidt v Rosewood Trust (2003/AC/709) later held that disclosure was a matter for the court's discretion as part of its supervisory jurisdic......
  • Estate Planning: Understanding Wills & Trust Law In Nigeria
    • Nigeria
    • Mondaq Nigeria
    • 3 April 2024
    ...and Public Trustee Law, Caps. 170 and 180 ss. 8 and 9, Adeseye v. Williams (1964) 2 All N.L.R 37 at p.39 5. Re Londonderry's Settlement [1965] Ch. 918 at 6. Bray v. Ford [1896] A.C. 44., H.L., at p.51. 7. Underhill and Hayton's Law of Trusts and Trustees 11th Edition at page 5 8. Williams &......
  • Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...Re Korvine’s Trust, [1921] 1 Ch 343 ..............................................................203–4 Re Londonderry’s Settlement, [1965] Ch 918 (CA) .............................................. 76 Re McColgan, [1969] 2 OR 152, 4 DLR (3d) 572 ..................................................
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Trusts. Second Edition Part Four. The Trustee
    • 1 September 2005
    ...67 Re Lloyd, [1938] O.R. 32, [1938] 1 D.L.R. 450 (H.C.J.)........................................ 25 Re Londonderry’s Settlement (1964), [1965] Ch. 918, [1964] 3 All E.R. 855, [1965] 2 W.L.R. 229, 108 Sol. J. 896 (C.A.)................................................. 154 Re Manisty’s Settl......
  • Equity and Trusts
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...breach of trust, so long as they acted honestly 29 Wagner v Van Cleef (1991), 5 OR (3d) 477 (Div Ct). 30 Re Londonderry’s Settlement , [1965] Ch 918 (CA). 31 See Pitt v Holt , [2013] UKSC 26, [2013] 2 AC 108. 32 Turner v Turner , [1984] Ch 100. 33 See Cowan v Scargill , [1985] Ch 270; Strot......
  • English fiduciary standards and trust law.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 32 No. 3, May 1999
    • 1 May 1999
    ...Tabor v. Brooks, 10 Ch. D. 273, 277 (1878); In re Gulbenkian's Settlement, [1970] App. Cas. 508, 518; In re Londonderry's Settlement, [1965] Ch. 918, 936 (C.A.); Edge v. Pensions Ombudsman, [1998] 2 All E.R. 547, 568-69 (82.) See Tabor, 10 Ch. D. at 278; Edge, [1998] 2 Ail E.R. at 568; In r......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT