Re M (Intractable Contract Dispute: Interim Care Order)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtFamily Division
Date2003
Year2003

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • C (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 July 2004
    ...a fluid position in the oral evidence. By the time he testified, Dr Cameron, impressed by the judgment of Wall J in Re M [Intractable Contact Dispute: Interim Care Order] 2 FLR 636, supported the guardian's recommendation that S should be removed into care. However, Mr Martin, when coming t......
  • Peterborough CC v K, L, M, N and P & ors
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court (EW)
    • 23 June 2022
    ...[2013] PTSR 1579, [2013] 5 Costs LR 738, [2016] 1 FLR 92. M (intractable contact dispute: interim care order), Re[2003] EWHC 1024 (Fam), [2003] 2 FLR 636. Piglowska v Piglowski[1999] 2 FCR 481, [1999] 1 WLR 1360, [1999] 3 All ER 632, [1999] 2 FLR 763, Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205, [......
  • Re R (Residence)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 April 2009
    ...of removing children from the arena to a safe haven – see Re M (Intractable Contact Dispute: Interim Care Order) [2003] EWHC 1024 (Fam): [2003] 2 FLR 636. In that case, a mother had falsely persuaded the children concerned that their father and paternal grandparents had both physically and ......
  • Re G (A Child: Intractable Contact)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 25 September 2013
    ...the three judgments of Wall J (as he then was) in Re M (Intractable Contact Dispute: Interim Care Orders) [2003] EWHC 1024 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 636, Re O (Contact: Withdrawal of Application) [2003] EWHC 3031 (Fam); [2004] 1 FLR 1258 and A v A (Shared Residence) [2004] EWHC 142 (Fam); [2004] ......
  • Get Started for Free