Re Macduff. Macduff v Macduff

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1896
Year1896
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
67 cases
  • Re Verrall. National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... C. 531 , 583, and In re Foveaux [ 1895 ] 2 Ch. 501 , 504, applied ... In re Macduff [ 1896 ] 2 Ch. 451 and Blair v. Duncan [ 1902 ] A. C. 37 distinguished ... Sect ... ...
  • R Charity Commission for England and Wales
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • Invalid date
    ...the 2006 Act (post, main judgment, paras 118, 128, 144, 162, 163, 165, 173, 177–181).Jones v Williams (1767) 2 Amb 651, In re Macduff [1896] 2 Ch 451, CA and In re Resch’s Will Trusts [1969] 1 AC 514, HL(E) applied.Taylor v Taylor (1910) 10 CLR 218 considered.(5) That whether a school with ......
  • Shaw, deceased, Re Public Trustee v Day
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Verge v Somerville
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Cas. 633 followed; and dictum of Lindley L.J. in In re Macduff [ 1896 ] 2 Ch. 451 , 464 approved ... In re Gassiot ( 1901 ) 70 L. J. (Ch.) 242 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free