Re Morvah Consols Tin Mining Company. McKay's Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1875 |
| Year | 1875 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
-
Recreational Holdings (Jamaica) Ltd v Carl Lazarus & Registrar of Titles
...limitation period, the title of the owner ‘shall be extinguished’. As Cozens-Hardy MR stated in In re Atkinson and Horsell's Contract [1912] 2 Ch D 1, 9 (discussing the impact of section 34 of the Real Property Limitation Act 1833, the statutory precursor to section 30 of the LAA), ‘…that e......
-
Pleau v. Nova Scotia (Prothonotary), (1998) 186 N.S.R.(2d) 1 (SC)
...true essence of retroactivity (retrospectivity), according to Driedger, (1974) at pp. 141-42, was recognized in West v. Gwynne , [1911] 2 Ch. D. 1, at pp. 11-12, as follows: 'Retrospective operation is one matter. Interference with existing rights is another. If an Act provides that as at a......
-
Marcan v Lloyds Bank Ltd (pet dis)
...family arrangement or an arrangement which merely prefers one set of creditors to another set. To that effect was In re Fasey, (1923) 2 Ch. Div., 1, decided by a very strong Court of Appeal (Lord Sterndale, Master of the Rolls, Lords Justices Warrington and Atkin). 12 In the present case th......
-
FHR European Ventures LLP and Others v Mankarious and Others
...was entitled to say that the cheque never became the property of the sellers, but remained the property of the company. Re Morvah Consols Tin Mining Company (1875) 2 Ch D 1 was a similar case. There the purchase price of a tin mine was to be satisfied partly in cash and partly in shares in ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
AN ACCOUNT OF ACCOUNTS
...2 Ch 809 at 852. See also Robinson v Abbott(1893) 20 VLR 346 (monetary relief awarded as a substitute to rescission); McKay'sCase(1875) 2 Ch D 1 at 8 (compensatory relief awarded for secret commission); and, post-Nocton, McKenzie v McDonald[1925] VLR 134. 54(1889) LR 14 App Cas 337. 55Nocto......
-
A re-examination of the original foundations of Anglo-American trademark law.
...of a business conveys the right to use the name of the business sold, but nothing else.). (178.) Ewing v. Buttercup Margarine Co., [1917] 2 Ch.D. 1 (C.A.) 11. Lord Cozens-Hardy made this point by relying on Day v. Brownrigg, [1878] 10 Ch.D. 294 (C.A.). (179.) Indeed, Bramwell, L.J., in the ......