Re Osborn & Osborn

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1913
Year1913

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Spillane v Dorgan
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 14 March 2016
    ...for in s. 2 of the 1849 Act. 59 Insofar as non compliance with s. 2 was concerned he relied upon the decision in RE Osborn & Osborn [1913] 3 KB 862 where Buckley L.J. had concluded that for a bill to be valid in an action in which party and party costs were recoverable that the whole bill ......
  • Mong Man Wai v H H Lau & Co (A Firm
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 30 May 2003
    ...cash account, the client being treated as having paid them on behalf of his solicitor." 46. Butterworths refers to Re Osborn & Osborn [1913] 3 KB 862 for its proposition. In that case, the English Court of Appeal was concerned with the contents of a bill of costs sent by a solicitor to his ......
  • Doyle v Buckley (t/a J Buckley & Company Solicitors)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 March 2013
    ...previous transaction between parties to taxation - State (Gallagher Shatter & Co) v de Valera [1986] ILRM 3; In re Osborn v Osborn [1913] 3 KB 862 and Smyth v Montgomery (Unrep, Blayney J, 7/7/1986) considered - Rules of the Superior Courts 1986 (SI 15/1986), O99, r 29(5) - Solicitors (Ire......
  • Smyth v Montgomery
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 7 July 1986
    ...KB 420 DREW V CLIFFORD 2 C & P 69 GALLAGHER SHATTER & CO, STATE V DE VALERA 1986 ILRM 3, 1987 IR 55, 1987 ILRM 555 OSBORN & OSBORN, IN RE 1913 3 KB 862 RSC O.99 r15(e) RSC O.99 r30(5) WALLER V LACY 1 M & G 54 Mr. Justice Blayney 1 The Plaintiff sustained injuries in a motor accident on the ......