Re P (A Child) (Parental dispute: Judicial determination)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 07 October 2002 |
| Date | 07 October 2002 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
COURT OF APPEAL
Before Lord Justice Thorpe and Mr Justice Bodey
In re P (a Child) (Parental dispute: Judicial determination)
Children - parents with shared responsibility - courts resolution as to childs place of education - courts duty to reach clear decision
Parents entitled to decision
Where parents with shared responsibility for their child asked the court to resolve a dispute between them as to which school that child should attend, the function of the court was to reach a clear decision to resolve...
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
R v Soneji (Kamlesh Kumar)
...to interpret and apply. Many confiscation orders have been overturned for very technical failures. An example is R v Palmer, The Times, 5 November 2002, where the Court of Appeal quashed a confiscation order of more than £30 million because of a defect in a prosecutor's notice. The Court of......
-
R v Knights (Richard Michael)
...had it considered them, as plainly it did, appropriate. Furthermore, now that the Court of Appeal's decision in R v Palmer, The Times, 5 November 2002, has been held to be wrongly decided at pp 1672-1673, paras 51-56 of the present case, subsequently affirmed by a five-member court in R v S......
-
R. v. Soneji et al., [2005] N.R. Uned. 130
...to interpret and apply. Many confiscation orders have been overturned for very technical failures. An example is R. v. Palmer , The Times, 5 November 2002, where the Court of Appeal quashed a confiscation order of more than £30 million because of a defect in a prosecutor's notice.......
-
R. v. Knights et al., [2005] N.R. Uned. 122 (HL)
...had it considered them, as plainly it did, appropriate. Furthermore, now that the Court of Appeal's decision in R. v. Palmer , The Times, 5 November 2002, has been held to be wrongly decided at pp. 1672-1673, paras. 51-56 of the present case, subsequently affirmed by a five-member cour......