Re Panama, New Zealand, and Australian Royal Mail Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
- Chase Manhattan Bank NA; Wong Tui San and Others v; Re EG Tan & Company (Pte)
-
National Westminster Bank plc v. Spectrum Plus Ltd. et al., (2005) 338 N.R. 201 (HL)
...Holroyd v. Marshall (1862), 10 H.L.C. 191; 11 E.R. 999, refd to. [para. 95]. Panama, New Zealand and Australian Royal Mail Co., Re (1870), 5 Ch. App. 318, refd to. [para. 96]. Florence Land and Public Works Co, Re; Ex parte Moor (1878), 10 Ch. D. 530, refd to. [paras. 96, 159]. Colonial Tru......
-
Re Keenan Bros. Ltd
...1985 IR 401 NAT PROVINCIAL BANK ENGLAND V UTD ELECTRIC THEATRES 1916 1 CH 132 PANAMA, NEW ZEALAND & AUSTRALIAN ROYAL MAIL CO, IN RE LR 5 CH APP 318 SIEBE GORMAN V BARCLAY'S BANK 1979 2 LlLR 142 STAVE FALLS LUMBER CO V WESTMINSTER TRUST CO 1940 4 DLR 382 TAILBY V OFFICIAL RECEIVER 13 AC 523......
-
Richard Dale Agnew and Another v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Another
...in England in a series of cases in the Chancery Division in the 1870's: In re Panama, New Zealand, and Australian Royal Mail Co (1870) 5 Ch App 318 (generally regarded as the first case in which the floating charge was recognised); In re Florence Land and Public Works Co, Ex p. Moor (1878)......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...16 DLR (4th) 319, 55 CBR (NS) 32 ................................... 436 Panama, New Zealand and Australian Royal Mint Company (Re) (1870), 5 Ch App 318 ....................................................................................... 4 Paquette (Re) (1993), 142 AR 305, 5 PPSAC (2d) 1......
-
Introduction and General Considerations
...191. 12 Gordon Mackay & Co , above note 9. The seminal English decision was Re Panama, New Zealand and Australian Royal Mint Company (1870), 5 Ch App 318. The loating charge was sanctioned by the House of Lords in Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd , [1897] AC 22 (albeit with Lord Macnaghten call......
-
IS THE FIXED CHARGE OVER BOOK DEBTS A VIABLE SECURITY ARRANGEMENT?
...of the Companies Act. (Cap 50, 1994 Ed) 5 Section 330 of the Companies Act. 6 In re Panama, New Zealand, and Australian Royal Mail Co (1870) LR 5 Ch App 318 is generally regarded as the first case to recognise the validity of the floating charge as a security device. For a summary of key is......
-
Rethinking Ethiopian Secured Transactions Law through comparative perspective: lessons from the Uniform Commercial Code of the US
...New York, Aspen Publishers, p. 36. 205 Holroyd v Marshall (1862) 10 HLC 191 & In Re Panama, New Zealand, and Australia Mail Co., (1870) 5 Ch App 318 are two of the earliest cases on floating charge. Rethinking Ethiopian Secured Transactions Law through Comparative Perspective … 185 concern ......
Request a trial to view additional results