Re Pattinson, decd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1885 |
| Year | 1885 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Re Figgis, deceased
...the available evidence; accordingly, the moneys formed part of the estate of the wife (post, pp. 144C, 146D). In re Pattinson, decd. (1885) 1 T.L.R. 216 and In re Harrison (1920) 90 L.J.Ch. 186 Marshal v. Crutwell (1875) L.R. 20 Eq. 328 distinguishable on the facts. (3) That, on its true co......
-
Lynch v Burke
...[1907] 2 IR 416. Owens v Greene and Freeley v Greene [1932] IR 225, [1932] 67 ILTR 161. Pattinson Deceased, In re, Graham v Pattinson [1885] 1 TLR 216. Reid, re [1921] 64 DLR 598, 50 OLR Russell v Scott [1936] 55 CLR 440, [1936] 36 SR NSW 454, 53 NSWWN 178. Ryans Car Hire v Attorney General......
-
Banque Indosuez v Madam Sumilan Awal also known as Aw Kim Lan and Others
...health and the wife did not operate the account, that benefit to the wife was intended: In re Harrison [1921] 90 Ch 186, In re Pattinson (1885) 1 TLR 216. Where a joint deposit account was opened instead of a current account, judges have remarked that it would be even more difficult to show......
-
Re Lee Mentor
...AC 41 (Per Viscount Simmonds, at p.450, Lord Reid, at p.456), Young v. Sealey (1949) 1 Ch 278 at 284, 295 (Romer J), In re Pattinson (1885) 1 TLR 216 (Chitty J), and Fowkes v. Passoe (1875) 10 Ch Appeal 343, at 353 (Mellish LJ). In In re Figgis, deceased, Megarry J said at p.146 that "The f......