Re Pearce. Alliance Assurance Company v Francis

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1914
Year1914
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Re Shiu Pak Nin
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • February 11, 2014
    ...Rawlings, [2014] 2 W.L.R. 213; [2014] 1 All E.R. 807; [2014] 2 FLR 555; [2014] W.T.L.R. 299; [2014] UKSC 2, applied. (17) Pearce, In re, [1914] 1 Ch. 254; [1911–13] All E.R. Rep. 1067, referred to. (18) Public Trustee v. Cooper, [2001] 1 W.T.L.R. 901, applied. (19) RHB Trust Co. Ltd. v. But......
  • B.(Deceased). O. v D
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • July 7, 1916
    ...(1) L. R. 6 H. L. 265. (2) L. R. 13 Eq. 36. (3) 92 L. T. R. 724. (4) L. R. 7 H. L. 568. (1) L. R. 13 Eq. 36. (2) L. R. 6 H. L. 265. (3) [1914] 1 Ch. 254. (4) 6 Ves. 43. (5) 15 Ch. D. 198. (6) 37 W. R. 472. (7) 1 Russ. & M. 581. (8) [1909] 1 Ch. 796. (9) [1906] 1 I. R. 487. (10) 30 Ch. D. 11......
  • Re McConney
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • Invalid date
  • Re McConney
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • March 1, 1976
    ...daughter rests on the parties seeking to extend or modify the prima facie meaning of the term. (See per Phillimore L.J. in In re Pearce [1914] 1 Ch. 254 at page 268) It must also, be remembered that in order to ascertain the persons intended to be benefited, evidence is admissible of the st......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT