Re Pearse's Settlement. Pearse v Pearse
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1909 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Akers v Samba Financial Group
...such as the will pre-exists the trust; a proposal to delete this word was rejected by a large majority". 49 The decision of Eve J in Re Pearse's Settlement [1909] 1 Ch 304 at page 310 is interesting, though the parties referred to it only in passing. In that case the lex situs (Jersey) was ......
-
Miller v Gianne
...102, referred to. (24) Pattni v. Ali, 2005–06 MLR 586; [2007] 2 W.L.R. 102; [2006] UKPC 51, followed. (25) Pearse”s Settlement, In re, [1909] 1 Ch. 304; (1909), 78 L.J. Ch. 73, considered. (26) Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Quintin, 1994–95 CILR N–15, followed. (27) Pro Swing Inc. v. Elta Golf ......
1 books & journal articles
-
The California Direct Primary
...J. Deering: Consolidated Supplement, 1917-1919, General Laws of California (1922), Act1010, Sec. 1, p. 1190.13 California Statutes, 1909, Ch. 304, p. 694.14 One instance of the practical working of thisclause in the law probably had a profound effecton the course of California politics. In ......