Re Penrose. Penrose v Penrose
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1933 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Re Urquhart
...Land Act 1882. Succession Act 1965 ss 9(2), 111-115, 118. Cases referred to in judgment Parsons v AG [1943] Ch 12 Penrose v Penrose [1933] Ch 793. The wife made her last will on the 6 April 1967, whereby she appointed the defendants to be her executors and trustees. By clause 3 of her will ......
- Equity Trustees Executors and Agency Company Ltd v Commissioner of Probate Duties (Vic)
-
Re Z Trust
...L.C. applied. (22) Muir v. Inland Revenue Commrs., [1966] 1 W.L.R. 1296; [1966] 3 All E.R. 38. (23) Penrose, In re, Penrose v. Penrose, [1933] Ch. 793; [1933] All E.R. Rep. 796, followed. (24) Rawcliffe v. Steele, 1993-95 MLR 426, dicta of Acting Deemster Hegarty applied. (25) Rawson Trust ......
-
Mark Arnold Clayton v Melanie Ann Clayton
...London, 2015) at 1395. 62 See also Kain v Hutton, above n 51, at [47], Re Park Public Trustee v Armstrong [1932] 1 Ch 580 and Re Penrose [1933] Ch 793. 63 Geraint Thomas Thomas on Powers (2nd ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012) at 64 TMSF, above n 42, at [40]–[44] and [60]. 65 At [......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
English fiduciary standards and trust law.
...power over the trustees was held to be fiduciary). (158.) See, e.g., In re Triffitt's Settlement, [1958] Ch. 852. (159.) In re Penrose, [1933] Ch. 793 (holding that the estate of a deceased husband, who had a power to appoint to himself the testatrix's trust fund, included such fund because......