Re Penrose. Penrose v Penrose
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Date | 1933 |
| Year | 1933 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
- A-G of Ceylon v AR Arunachalam Chettiar and Others (No 1)
-
Re Urquhart
...Land Act 1882. Succession Act 1965 ss 9(2), 111-115, 118. Cases referred to in judgment Parsons v AG [1943] Ch 12 Penrose v Penrose [1933] Ch 793. The wife made her last will on the 6 April 1967, whereby she appointed the defendants to be her executors and trustees. By clause 3 of her will ......
-
Re Z Trust
... ... Inland Revenue Commrs. , [1966] 1 W.L.R. 1296 ; [1966] 3 All E.R. 38. (23) Penrose, In re, Penrose v. Penrose , [1933] Ch. 793 ; [1933] All E.R. Rep. 796 , followed. (24) ... ...
-
Mark Arnold Clayton v Melanie Ann Clayton
...London, 2015) at 1395. 62 See also Kain v Hutton, above n 51, at [47], Re Park Public Trustee v Armstrong [1932] 1 Ch 580 and Re Penrose [1933] Ch 793. 63 Geraint Thomas Thomas on Powers (2nd ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012) at 64 TMSF, above n 42, at [40]–[44] and [60]. 65 At [......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
English fiduciary standards and trust law.
...power over the trustees was held to be fiduciary). (158.) See, e.g., In re Triffitt's Settlement, [1958] Ch. 852. (159.) In re Penrose, [1933] Ch. 793 (holding that the estate of a deceased husband, who had a power to appoint to himself the testatrix's trust fund, included such fund because......
