Re PFTZM Ltd ((in Liquidation)); Jourdain and Others v Paul

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1995
Year1995
CourtChancery Division (Companies Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • Moorview Developments Ltd and Others v First Active Plc and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 6 Marzo 2009
    ...Plc v Etridge (No 2) [2002] 2 AC 773; Re Hydrodam (Corby) Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 180; Re Tasbian Ltd (No 3) [1993] BCLC 297; Re Pftzm Ltd [1995] BCC 280; Norberg v Wynrib [1992] 92 DLR (4th) 449; Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 AER 378; Phonographic Performance (Irl) Ltd v Cody [1998] ......
  • Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Fielding
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 27 Julio 2005
    ...trial, the allegation that the bank was a shadow director was "rightly abandoned": Re MC Bacon Ltd [1990] BCLC 324, 325. 1265 In Re PTZFM Ltd [1995] 2 BCLC 354 it was alleged that a lender had become a shadow director of the borrower company. Having quoted the statutory definition of "shado......
  • Soden v British & Commonwealth Holdings Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 Mayo 1996
    ...Co. v. Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] A.C. 133; [1973] 3 W.L.R. 164; [1973] 2 All E.R. 943; H.L.(E.) P.F.T.Z.M. Ltd., In re [1995] B.C.C. 280 Reg. v. Lewes Justices, Ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department [1973] A.C. 388; [1972] 3 W.L.R. 279; [1972] 2 All E.R. 1057, Re......
  • Re Saad Investments Company Ltd and Singularis Holdings Ltd
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 15 Abril 2013
    ...Muhl v Ardra Insurance Co LtdBDLR [1997] Bda LR 36 Re Maxwell Communications Corp plcUNK [1994] BCC 741 Re PFTZM Ltd (Jourdain v Paul)UNK [1995] BCC 280 Cross-border cooperation — Foreign liquidation — Production of documents — Examination orders — Judicial assistance — Common law — Scope o......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • The Regulation of Shadow Directors
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 Mayo 2019
    ...297 (CA); Re Unisoft Group Ltd (No 3)[1994] 1 BCLC 609; Re Hydrodan (Corby) Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 180 (ChD); Re PFTZM Ltd (inliquidation) [1995] 2 BCLC 354 (ChD); Re Kaytech International plc; Secretary of State for Trade andIndustry v Kaczer & Others [1999] 2 BCLC 351 (CA); Secretary of State ......
  • Security, Insolvency and Risk: Who Pays the Price?
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 62-5, September 1999
    • 1 Septiembre 1999
    ...ibid; Scott, ibid.114 See Oditah, n 12 above, 17; Insolvency Act 1986 ss 214, 217(7) and 251; ex p Copp [1989]BCLC 13;Re PFTZM Ltd [1995] BCC 280.115 LoPucki, n 73 above; S. Knippenberg, ‘The Unsecured Creditor’s Bargain: An Essay in Reply,Reprisal or Support’ (1994) 80 Va L Rev 1967; Bebch......
  • Piercing the veil on corporate groups in Australia: the case for reform.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 2, August 2009
    • 1 Agosto 2009
    ...Ltd [1988] 1 Ch 477; Re Unisoft Group Ltd [No 3] [1994] 1 BCLC 609; Re Hydrodam (Corby) Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 180; Re PFTZM Ltd (in liq) [1995] 2 BCLC 354; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Deverell [2001] Ch 340. See also Kuwait Asia Bank EC v National Mutual Life Nominees Ltd [1991]......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT