Re Phelan, decd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1971
Year1971
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Timothy Mundil-Williams v Richard John Williams
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 16 d2 Março d2 2021
    ...to the testatrix's intentions by means of construction of what remained. 73 In re Morris, deceased was followed in In re Phelan, deceased [1972] Fam 33, where at 35 Stirling J summarised the law: “The court also has power, if it is satisfied as to the testator's clear intention, to omit cer......
  • The Estate of Stephen Michael Tester
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 d2 Novembro d2 2017
    ...Estate of Wesley (deceased) (1998) 71 SASR 1 at 4; Lesses (Deceased) [2013] SASC 23 at [21]. 11 See, for example, Re Phalen (Deceased) [1971] 3 WLR 888. 12 See, for example, Collins and Tuffley v Elstone [1893] P 1, Estate of Beech v Public Trustee [1923] P 46; Re Horrocks, Taylor v Kershaw......
  • Kench-Andrews v The Succession Act 1965
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 d5 Julho d5 2022
    ...did not have knowledge of or approve the intended revocation. Relying on the judgments in Re Keenan [1946] 80 ILTR 1 and Re Phelan [1972] Fam 33, Baker J stated as follows:- 15. Implicit in this dicta is that a clear revocation clause, while it might raise a presumption that a testator inte......
  • Kench-Andrews v The Succession Act 1965
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 d5 Julho d5 2022
    ...did not have knowledge of or approve the intended revocation. Relying on the judgments in Re Keenan [1946] 80 ILTR 1 and Re Phelan [1972] Fam 33, Baker J stated as follows:- 15. Implicit in this dicta is that a clear revocation clause, while it might raise a presumption that a testator inte......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 d1 Agosto d1 2022
    ...2 All ER 174, [2011] 2 WLR 1086 27, 66 Pesticcio v Huet [2003] 2 P & CR D22, 73 BMLR 57, [2003] All ER (D) 237 (Apr), ChD 82 Phelan, Re [1972] Fam 33, [1971] 3 WLR 888, [1971] 3 All ER 1256, 115 Sol Jo 710 110–111 Pinnell v Anison [2005] EWHC 1421 (Ch), [2006] WTLR 1047, [2005] All ER (D) 4......
  • Revocation of a Will
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 d1 Agosto d1 2022
    ...the relevant intention. For example, where the revocation was in fact an act of inadvertence or a mistake, as occurred in Re Phelan [1971] 3 All ER 1256, or where the will was destroyed when the testator/testatrix was drunk, as in In the Goods of Brassington [1902] P 1. In Re Phelan , the t......
  • Testamentary Capacity and Intention
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Wills A Practical Guide - 2nd Edition Contents
    • 30 d5 Agosto d5 2019
    ...cases, the offending words are omitted from the probate of the will on the basis the testator did not know or approve them (see Re Phelan [1972] Fam 33). However, if the testator intends to include words in a will and does so but is mistaken as to the legal effect of the will as a whole, or......
  • Where There's a Will There's a Way: Marley v Rawlings and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 78-1, January 2015
    • 1 d4 Janeiro d4 2015
    ...ibid at [41].19 Identified in the Law Reform Committee, Interpretation of Wills (Report #19, 1973).20 See, for example, Re Phelan [1972] Fam 33. Note, however, that the power does not extend to theomission of words that the testator was aware of but about which he was mistaken as to their le......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT