Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date15 July 1921
Date15 July 1921
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
198 cases
14 books & journal articles
  • Consequences of a Building or other Land Being Included in the List of Assets of Community Value
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Assets of Community Value. Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2017
    ...[1961] AC 388. The Wagon Mound was the landmark decision in which the Privy Council overruled the Court of Appeal decision in Re Polemis [1921] 3 KB 560 and purported to reinstate foreseeability and to oust causation as the test of the extent of liability in an action for negligence. In the......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Assets of Community Value. Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2017
    ...HL 2.18 PNC Telecom plc v Thomas [2002] EWHC 2848 (Ch), [2003] BCC 202, [2004] 1 BCLC 88 3.168 Polemis and Furness Withy & Co Ltd, Re [1921] 3 KB 560, (1921) 8 Ll L Rep 351, CA 5.130 Ponnamma v Arumogam [1905] AC 383, PC 6.107, 6.108, 6.118, 6.120 Pullan v Leeds City Council [2016] UKFTT CR......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Torts. Sixth Edition
    • 25 June 2020
    ...309 ........................................................................................... 219 Polemis & Furness Withy & Co, Re, [1921] 3 KB 560, [1921] All ER Rep 40 (CA) ........................................................................................ 99 Popoff v Krafczyk, [19......
  • Negligence: Basic Principles
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Torts. Sixth Edition
    • 25 June 2020
    ...reassessment of the rule of remoteness by the Privy Council in Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts 213 Re Polemis & Furness Withy & Co , [1921] 3 KB 560 (CA). THE L AW OF TORTS 100 Dock and Engineering Co Ltd , The Wagon Mound (No 1) . 214 In that case, the defendant, who was the charterer o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT