Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date15 July 1921
Date15 July 1921

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
142 cases
23 books & journal articles
  • 4. The role of courts in commercial–maritime arbitration in English law
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis International Commercial and Marine Arbitration
    • Invalid date
    ... ... arbitration agreements. For instance, a company is bound by an agreement ... entered into on its behalf even though it ... 65 The Damianos [1971] 2 AllER 1301, Re Polemis And Furness Ltd ... [1921] 3 KB 560 ... 66 [1994] 2 LR 366 ... 67 Fatem ... ...
  • Chapter 7: Collisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Maritime Law
    • Invalid date
    ...of hiring in addition. Held: that although the damages in respect of the hiring of the replacement were not recoverable under the rule in Re Polemis (see page 329) since that was the direct result of the claimant’s financial instability and not the defendant shipowner’s negligence, neverthe......
  • Chapter 3: Legal liability 1
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Construction Insurance and UK Construction Contracts
    • Invalid date
    ...see McLoughlin v Jones [2002] QB 1312. See also Berent v Family Mosaic Housing [2012] EWCA Civ 961; [2012] BLR 488. 66 Re Polemis and Furness Withy & Co [1921] 3 KB 560 and The Wagon Mound ( supra 67 Per Arden LJ in Johnson v Gore Wood (No. 2) [2003] EWCA Civ 1728 at para. 93 citing Wroth v......
  • Chapter 10: Claims other than in contract
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Bills of Lading
    • Invalid date
    ...the classification society accepted it was a case of physical damage. 26 Although, as Scrutton L.J. trenchantly pointed out in Re Polemis [1921] 3 K.B. 560, 577, what the courts have held to be a “direct” result in one situation appears not to be so in another, but immaterially different, 2......
  • Get Started for Free