Re Ponder. Ponder v Ponder
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1921 |
Date | 1921 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Harvell v Foster
...But the Lord Chief Justice regarded the question as, in effect, determined by the Judgment of Mr Justice Sargant in the case of In re Ponder, 1921 2 Chancery, 59, as deciding that once the debts and expenses and any legacies had been discharged or satisfied and the clear residue of the est......
-
Helen Elizabeth Batt v Hugh Charles Boswell
...Alternatively, if the administration is completed then the executors will hold the trust assets as the trustees: Re Ponder [1921] 2 Ch 59; Re Cockburn [1957] Ch 87 There is also authority for saying that where specific assets are given (as opposed to the residue of the estate) the executo......
- Australian Olympic Committee Inc. v the Big Fights Inc.
-
Willingale (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Islington Green Investment Company
...to:Lord Sudeley v. Attorney General ELR[1897] A.C. 11Duke of Northumberland v. Attorney General ELR[1905] A.C. 406;In re Ponder ELR[1921] 2 Ch. 59In re Cockburn's Will Trusts ELR[1957] Ch. 438;Rex v. Special Commissioners of Income Tax (ex parte Dr. Barnado's Homes) TAXELR7 T.C. 646; [1921]......
Request a trial to view additional results