Re Ponder. Ponder v Ponder

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1921
Date1921
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Harvell v Foster
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 16 July 1954
    ...But the Lord Chief Justice regarded the question as, in effect, determined by the Judgment of Mr Justice Sargant in the case of In re Ponder, 1921 2 Chancery, 59, as deciding that once the debts and expenses and any legacies had been discharged or satisfied and the clear residue of the est......
  • Helen Elizabeth Batt v Hugh Charles Boswell
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 25 March 2022
    ...Alternatively, if the administration is completed then the executors will hold the trust assets as the trustees: Re Ponder [1921] 2 Ch 59; Re Cockburn [1957] Ch 87 There is also authority for saying that where specific assets are given (as opposed to the residue of the estate) the executo......
  • Australian Olympic Committee Inc. v the Big Fights Inc.
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Willingale (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Islington Green Investment Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 July 1972
    ...to:Lord Sudeley v. Attorney General ELR[1897] A.C. 11Duke of Northumberland v. Attorney General ELR[1905] A.C. 406;In re Ponder ELR[1921] 2 Ch. 59In re Cockburn's Will Trusts ELR[1957] Ch. 438;Rex v. Special Commissioners of Income Tax (ex parte Dr. Barnado's Homes) TAXELR7 T.C. 646; [1921]......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT