Re Racal Communications Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Lord Diplock,Lord Salmon,Lord Edmund Davies,Lord Keith of Kinkel,Lord Scarman |
| Judgment Date | 03 July 1980 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1980] UKHL J0703-2 |
| Date | 03 July 1980 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
205 cases
- Syarikat Kenderaan Melayu Kelantan Bhd v Transport Workers Union
- Inchcape Malaysia Holdings Bhd v RB Gray and Another
-
Aden Refinery Company Ltd v Ugland Management Company Ltd
...v. Counting Instruments Ltd. [1977] F.S.R. 569, also reported as a note to Smiths Ltd. v. Middleton [1986] 1 W.L.R. 598, 615. 26 In Racal Communications Ltd. [1981] A.C. 374 an attempt was made to apply the same principle to section 441 of the Companies Act 1948 and it was rejected by the......
-
Wong Hong Toy and Another v Public Prosecutor
...2 KB 368; [1950] 2 All ER 170 (folld) R v William Joseph Thomas Reilly (1982) 75 Cr App Rep 266 (refd) Racal Communications Ltd, Re [1981] AC 374; [1980] 2 All ER 634 (folld) Wilson v Colchester Justices [1985] AC 750; [1985] 2 All ER 97 (refd) Wong Hong Toy v PP [1985-1986] SLR (R) 371; [1......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs V Yusuf:1 One Door Closed, Another Opened?
...163, 178 (Brennan, Deane, Toohey, Gaudron and McHugh JJ).126 Ibid 179. The High Court cited Lord Diplock in Re Racal Communications Ltd [1981] AC 374,383.127 Ibid. This is the passage that was quoted by McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ in Yusuf.128 The distinction has now also been abolished in ......
-
Revisiting the Precedential Status of Crown Court Decisions
...effect even though they are subject to neitherjudicial review nor, if statute should so preclude, appeal (see Re Racal Communications Ltd [1981] AC 374, 384)—whose legalrulings cannot be corrected in a judicial forum should not, as a matter of principle, be allowed to strictly bind itself o......
-
‘Australian Exceptionalism’ in Judicial Review
...Law', above n 3, 118–19 (difference due to institutional design of separation-of-powers). 60 See Re Racal Communications Ltd [1981] AC 374, 382–3 (Lord Diplock); Bulk Gas Users Group v A-G [1983] NZLR 129, 133 (Cooke J). 2008 'Australian Exceptionalism' in Judicial Review 11 _______________......
-
Decisions of the extinct Appellate Committee of the House of Lords will continue to resonate in South African administrative, constitutional and international law
...3 of 2000. See Hoexter (n 59) 395, 424.782001 3 SA 472 (SCA).792004 5 SA 262 (SCA).802000 1 SA 1 (CC).81(N 65).82See Hoexter (n 59) 286.831981 AC 374. See O’Reilly v Mackman 1983 2 AC 237, 238.841992 4 SA 69 (A) 93-94.85(N 84).86(N 65).87Id.881997 3 SA 204 (A) Ext inct A ppell ate C ommi tt......
Request a trial to view additional results