Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL,LORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD,LORD STEYN,LORD HOFFMANN,LORD CARSWELL |
| Judgment Date | 28 October 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] UKHL 47 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 28 October 2004 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
461 cases
-
CC v AB
...focus" on the facts of the individual case, rather than by purporting to create general principles of law judicially: see e.g. Re S [2005] 1 AC 593 at [17] and Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457. 14 It may be helpful to have in mind in this context the observations of Sir Mark Potter P in A......
-
Harlow Higinbotham (formerly BWK) v Wipaporn Teekhungam
...decision. Indeed, anyone remotely concerned for the welfare of the children would never have brought the proceedings at all. In Re S [2005] 1 AC 593, the likely effect on a child of reports of a criminal trial in which his mother was charged with murder was described as “ dreadfully painful......
-
Pavel Karpov v William Felix Browder and Others
...45 The broad underlying approach was set out in the speech of Lord Steyn in Re S (at child) (Identification: restriction on publication) [2005] 1 AC 593 at [17], setting out four propositions where the rights of a claimant under article 8 (protection of reputation) and a defendant under art......
- R A’s Application
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Privilege, And This Time We Mean It
...127 3 [2004] UKHL 22; [2004] 2 AC 457 4 See, in particular, Cream Holdings v Banerjee [2004] UKHL 44; [2005] 1 AC 253 5 In re S (A Child) [2004] UKHL 47; [2005] 1 AC 593 6 See eg Radio France v France (2005) 40 EHRR 706 7 Von Hannover v Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1 8 GKR Karate v Yorkshire Post......
-
Harassment And The Handmaid's Tale
...in this case, it did not. Mr Justice Murray reminded us of "the ultimate balancing test" cited by Lord Steyn in Re S (F) (a child) [2004] UKHL 47 - that neither article takes precedence over the other and that there needs to be an "intense focus" on the importance of the rights being claime......
21 books & journal articles
-
A COMMON LAW TORT OF PRIVACY?
...Press, 2nd Ed, 2011) at paras 5.28-5.79. 35 See Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd[2008] EWHC 1777 at [14], per Eady J. 36Re S (a child)[2004] UKHL 47; [2005] 1 AC 593 at [17], per Lord Steyn. 37Re S (a child)[2004] UKHL 47; [2005] 1 AC 593 at [17], per Lord Steyn. 38 See generally Clerk an......
-
Invasion of Privacy/Misuse of Private Information
...Convention rights in the light of an “intense focus” upon the individual facts of the case: see e.g. Campbell and Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593. It was expressly recognised that no one Convention right takes automatic precedence over another. In the present context, for example, it has to ......
-
Interlocutory Injunctions: Specific Areas
...both England and Strasbourg under the European Convention on Human Rights. 105 Campbell , above note 73 at para 21; Re S (A Child) , [2005] 1 AC 593 at para 23 (HL). 106 A v B , above note 104 at para 11, guideline (i). Interlocutory Injunctions: Speciic Areas 111 is still appropriate where......
-
Interlocutory Injunctions: Specific Areas
...and Strasbourg under the European Convention of Human Rights. 53 Campbell v. MGN Ltd. , above note 50 at para. 21; and Re S (A Child) , [2005] 1 A.C. 593 at para. 23 (H.L.). 54 A. v. B. plc , above note 52 at para. 11, guideline (i). 55 Ibid. , guideline (x). Interlocutory Injunctions: Spec......
Request a trial to view additional results