Re S (A Minor) (Child abduction: Delay)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Judgment Date | 16 October 1997 |
| Date | 16 October 1997 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Re F (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
...draws it meaning from the definitions, structure and purposes of the Convention.” See also the observations of Lord Donaldson MR in Re C (A Minor) (Abduction) [1989] 1 FLR 403 at 412. 17 In Re D (A Child) [2007] 1 FLR 961, at paragraph 26 Baroness Hale made clear that in each case: “The que......
-
Re G and A (Abduction: Consent)
...of the Convention, which is to ensure the swift return of a child who has been wrongfully removed (see Re S (Child Abduction: Delay) [1998] 1 FLR 651. [23] On these legal principles, there was not much issue between counsel. Where there was legal dispute arose in the context of discussion a......
-
P v B (No 2) (Child Abduction: Delay)
...2 F.L.R. 690. Re N. (Minors) (Abduction) [1991] 1 F.L.R. 413; [1991] Fam. Law 367; [1991] F.C.R. 765. Re S. (Child Abduction: Delay) [1998] 1 F.L.R. 651. Re S. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1991] 2 F.L.R. 1. Re S. (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1994] 1 F.L.R. 819; [1994] 2 F.C.R. 945. Thomson......
-
A C v A S
...place of habitual residence in March 2001 was France. However, counsel for the father submitted this to be the case on the basis of Re S [1998] 1 FLR 651. What happened in that case was similar to the present case in that there were two removals. The mother removed the child from Germany to......
Get Started for Free
