Re Selwyn's Conveyance ; Hayman v Soole

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1967
Date1967

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Bath Rugby Ltd v Caroline Greenwood
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 Diciembre 2021
    ... ... ” , is still subject to a restrictive covenant imposed in a conveyance of the Rec dated 6 April 1922 ( “the 1922 conveyance” ). That turns ... ...
  • Wrotham Park Estate Company Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...415, C.A. Seager v. Copydex Ltd. (No. 2) [1969] 1 W.L.R. 809; [1969] 2 All E.R. 718, C.A. Selwyn's Conveyance, In re [1967] Ch. 674; [1967] 2 W.L.R. 647; [1967] 1 All E.R. Stilwell v. Blackman [1968] Ch. 508; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 1397; [1967] 3 All E.R. 514. Shepherd Homes Ltd. v. Sandham [1971]......
  • Stilwell v Blackman
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...115; [1961] 2 W.L.R. 1018; [1961] 2 All E.R. 696. F4[1967] 2 W.L.R. 647; [1967] 1 All E.R. F5[1936] Ch. 451; [1936] 1 All E.R. 363, C.A. F6[1937] Ch. 473; 53 T.L.R. 793; [1937] 2 All E.R. 691. F7[1964] Ch. 38; [1962] 3 W.L.R. 192; [1962] 2 All E.R. 305. F8[1966] 1 W.L.R. 841; [1966] 1 All E......
  • Core (UK) Ltd v Benjamin Puncher
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 31 Julio 2025
    ...in anticipation of dividend payments would necessarily operate as a loan, which would be in breach of the Companies ActRe George Newman & Co [ 1895 1 Ch 674). While directors may rely upon informal and unanimous consent among the shareholders to a course of action (see Re Duomatic [1969] 2 ......