Re O'Shea. ex parte Lancaster
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1911 |
| Year | 1911 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Khodari v Tamimi
...loan that it be applied in discharge of the debt. The court contrasted such a situation with that, exemplified in its decision in In re O'Shea Ex p. Lancaster [1911] 2 KB 981, in which the claimant made a loan to the defendant (or, as in O'Shea, guaranteed his overdraft) in the expectation,......
- Woolf v Freeman
-
Estate Wege v Strauss
...have been sold. See Salmon & Winfield on Contracts (p. 161); Sutter v Briggs (supra) was decided on an old statute. See In re O'Shea (1911, 2 K.B. 981). The fact that a betting transaction is unenforceable at law does not deprive it of value. Unenforceability is not the test under sec. 24 o......
-
Nossel v Friedman
...85; Ruskin v Wasserman and Others, 1917 W.L.D. 174 at p. 176; Sykes v Beadon, 11 Ch. 170, at p. 194; In re O'Shea, Ex parte Lancaster, 1911 (2) K.B. 981; Macdonald v Green, 1950 (2) A.E.R. 1240; Cheshire and Fifoot Law of Contract, pp. 208, 216. C. J. M. Nathan, for the respondent: I conced......
Request a trial to view additional results