Re a Solicitor

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date24 September 1991
Date24 September 1991
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
47 cases
  • Alrich Development Pte Ltd v Rafiq Jumabhoy (No 2)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 4 Julio 1994
    ......Wan said it was a gentleman`s agreement. Alrich sold the three plots to Toa Corporation on 16 March 1990 at an overall price of $260 psf. However, Wan claimed that Lam insisted on being paid at $308 psf in respect of 6 KCR. His solicitor corrected him and said it was $288, giving credit to the 10% deposit already paid by Lam. The reason would appear to be this: as 38 and 40 EBR would not themselves be able to fetch $260 psf, Lam wanted a bigger share of the profits. Wan said Alrich acceded to Lam`s demand. On 18 July 1990 Alrich ......
  • Ian Charles Hannam v The Financial Conduct Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 27 Mayo 2014
    ...also agree that deprivation of fundamental liberties is not a necessary ingredient. This is demonstrated by reference to in Re a Solicitor [1993] QB 69 where the criminal standard was applied to solicitors’ disciplinary proceedings. Although the remarks of Lord Lane CJ in that case were add......
  • Re W-A (children: foreign conviction)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 Agosto 2022
    ...r 34(3). European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950, art 6. Cases referred to A solicitor, Re [1993] QB 69, [1992] 2 WLR 552, [1992] 2 All ER 335, B (minors) (care proceedings: issue estoppel), Re [1997] Fam 117, [1997] 1 FCR 477, [1997] 3 WLR 1, [1......
  • Paul Davidson and Ashley Tatham v The Financial Services Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 16 Mayo 2006
    ...concerning the legal profession. .At [20] the Privy Council referred to the decision of the Divisional Court in In Re a Solicitor [1993] QB 69 which concerned the standard of proof to be applied by the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Law Society and where Lord Lane referred to “cases such as t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Changing Standards – The Standard Of Proof In Lawyers' Disciplinary Proceedings
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 18 Diciembre 2017
    ...of authority as to the appropriate standard of proof to apply. Until the Arslan Judgment, the main case authorities, (Re a Solicitor [1993] QB 69 and Campbell v Hamlet [2005] UKPC 19) upon which the SDT relies, provided that the correct standard in disciplinary proceedings concerning the le......
2 books & journal articles
  • Market abuse, fraud and misleading communications
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 19-3, July 2012
    • 13 Julio 2012
    ...v. Texas (1979) 441 US 418.83. In Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1966] AC 563 HL at 586.84. Lord Lane in re a solicitor [1993] QB 69.85. Richards LJ in R vMental Health Review Tribunal (December 2005 unreported).86. Directly in ss 1-4 and ss 5-9 list activities that are in......
  • The End of Money‐Laundering Prosecution in the City?
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Money Laundering Control No. 3-2, April 1999
    • 1 Abril 1999
    ...to the Saunders requirements. (16) [1957] 1 QB 247. (17) [1957] 1 QB 247, 258. (18) [1985] 1 WLR 749. (19) [1985] 1 WLR 749, 755. (20) [1993] QB 69. (21) [1993] QB 69, 81. (22) In re Shumiatcher and Law Society of Saskatchewan [1966] 60 DLR (2d) 318, 328 per Culliton CJS and In re a Barrist......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT