Re a Solicitor

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Judgment Date24 September 1991
Date24 September 1991
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
47 cases
  • Alrich Development Pte Ltd v Rafiq Jumabhoy (No 2)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 4 July 1994
    ...Enoch and Zaretzky, Bock & Co's Arbitration,In re [1910] 1 KB 327 (folld) Fallon v Calvert [1960] 2 QB 201 (refd) Firm of Solicitors, Re A [1993] QB 69; [1992] 1 All ER 353 (folld) Jacobs v Tarleton (1848) 11 QB 421; 116 ER 534 (folld) Lennon v Gibson and Howes Limited [1919] AC 709 (folld)......
  • Borges v Fitness to Practice Committee
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 29 January 2004
    ...R. v. HawkinsUNK [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043. R. v. KhanUNK [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531. R. v. SmithUNK [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915. Re a solicitorWLRUNK [1992] 2 W.L.R. 552; [1992] 2 All E.R. 335. Southern Health Board v. C.H.IRDLRM [1996] 1 I.R. 219; [1996] 2 I.L.R.M. 142. Administrative law - Medical practitio......
  • The Assets Recovery Agency v Gheorghe Virtosu and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 5 February 2008
    ...proved by the Director in this case. And the issue is identical in both the French case and the present one. 41 Further, in Re a Solicitor [1993] QB 69, at p78–9 Lord Lane CJ giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal said: “Mr. Robertson also placed reliance on Hollington v. F. Hewthorn & ......
  • The Queen (on the application of Johannes Philip Bonhoeffer) v General Medical Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 June 2011
    ...and Gallagher v Revenue Commissioners (No. 2) [1995] 1 IR 55. To the extent that General Medical Council v Spackman [1943] AP 627 and Re A Solicitor [1992] 2 WLR 552 suggest that a different approach is permissible, I do not think they should be followed." (paragraph 35) 73 However, it sho......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Changing Standards – The Standard Of Proof In Lawyers' Disciplinary Proceedings
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 18 December 2017
    ...of authority as to the appropriate standard of proof to apply. Until the Arslan Judgment, the main case authorities, (Re a Solicitor [1993] QB 69 and Campbell v Hamlet [2005] UKPC 19) upon which the SDT relies, provided that the correct standard in disciplinary proceedings concerning the le......
2 books & journal articles
  • Market abuse, fraud and misleading communications
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime Nbr. 19-3, July 2012
    • 13 July 2012
    ...v. Texas (1979) 441 US 418.83. In Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1966] AC 563 HL at 586.84. Lord Lane in re a solicitor [1993] QB 69.85. Richards LJ in R vMental Health Review Tribunal (December 2005 unreported).86. Directly in ss 1-4 and ss 5-9 list activities that are in......
  • The End of Money‐Laundering Prosecution in the City?
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Money Laundering Control Nbr. 3-2, April 1999
    • 1 April 1999
    ...to the Saunders requirements. (16) [1957] 1 QB 247. (17) [1957] 1 QB 247, 258. (18) [1985] 1 WLR 749. (19) [1985] 1 WLR 749, 755. (20) [1993] QB 69. (21) [1993] QB 69, 81. (22) In re Shumiatcher and Law Society of Saskatchewan [1966] 60 DLR (2d) 318, 328 per Culliton CJS and In re a Barrist......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT