Re South Durham Iron Company. Smith's Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1878
Year1878
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • Commissioner of Valuation v Sligo Harbour Commissioners
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 June 1898
    ...13 Ch. D. 648. Mr. Justice Gibson's judgmentIR [1897] 2 I. R. 528. Pugh v. Golden Bridge Co.ELR 15 Ch. D. 330. Smith's CaseELR 11 Ch. D. 579. The Limerick CaseUNKIR I. R. 6 C. L. 432. Tyne Commissioners v. ChirtonENR 1 E. & E. 516. 214 THE IRISH REPORTS. [1899. COMMISSIONER OF VALUATION v. ......
1 books & journal articles
  • THE SUPER PANEL DOCTRINE.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 54 No. 1, September 2021
    • 10 September 2021
    ...The Court of Appeal held that it was normally bound to follow its previous decisions as early as 1879 in Re South Durham Iron Company (1879), 11 ChD 579, 48 LJ Ch480 (CA). It would adopt horizontal stare decisis as a rule of law in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd, [1944] KB 718, [1944] 2 A......