Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Re South Eastern Railway Company and London County Council's Contract. South Eastern Railway Company v London County Council

The Law Reports Cited in 48 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1915
Date1915
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
35 cases
  • BP Petroleum Developments Ltd v Ryder
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Rugby Joint Water Board v Shaw-Fox ; Rugby Joint Water Board v Foottit
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 February 1972
    ...uses." Cedar Rapids Manufacturing and Power Co. v. Lacoste [1914] A.C. 569 P.C. at pages 576 and 579 per Lord Dunedin. South Eastern Railway Co. v. London County Council [1915] 2 Ch. 252 C.A. At page 258 Eve J. said "Increase in value consequent on the execution of the undertaking for or in......
  • Decision Nº ACQ 83 2011. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 28-05-2013
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
    • 28 May 2013
    ...Pointe Gourde Quarrying & Transport Co Ltd v Sub-Intendant of Crown Lands [1947] AC 565 South Eastern Railway Co v London County Council [1915] 2 Ch 252 Fraser v City of Fraserville [1917] AC 187 Rugby Joint Water Board v Shaw-Fox [1973] AC 202 Minister of Transport v Pettitt (1968) 20 P & ......
  • Planning Cttee. v Lesquende Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 5 January 1998
    ...cases cited by counsel: Cedars Rapids Mfg. & Power Co. v. Lacoste, [1914] A.C. 569 ([1914] UKPC 5). South E. Ry. Co. v. London C.C., [1915] 2 Ch. 252. Legislation construed: Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961, art. 12: The relevant terms of this article are set out at......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Utility wayleaves: a compensation lottery?
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Property Investment & Finance No. 20-2, April 2002
    • 1 April 2002
    ...RVR 211.52. (1994) 69 P&CR 135.53. It is doubtful whether set off can be implied ± South Eastern Railway Co.v.London CountyCouncil [1915] 2 Ch. 252 per Eve J.54. Hutchison, N., Cameron A. and Rowan-Robinson, J. (1999), ``Assessing the compensationfor electricity wayleaves'', Journal of Prop......
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...Pointe Gourde, it would have done so more clearly as it did in s 33(1)(b) in overriding [South Eastern Railway Co v London County Council[1915] 2 Ch 252], rather than leaving it to implications.” 17.47 In regard to s 33(5)(e) of the Act, he was of the opinion that it has nothing to do with ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT