Re Tinker's Settlement
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1960 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
- HTV Cymru (Wales) Ltd, Ex p
-
W v M & D
...S24(5) L (C), IN RE 1969 1 CH 587 1968 2 WLR 1275 1968 1 AER 1104 MCGHEE & ORS SNELLS EQUITY 31ED 2005 662 TINKERS SETTLEMENT, IN RE 1960 1 WLR 1011 1960 3 AER 85 (NOTE) LAND & CONVEYANCING LAW REFORM ACT 2009 S24(4)(A) LAND & CONVEYANCING LAW REFORM ACT 2009 S24(4)(B) TRUSTS Variation Amen......
-
Belhumeur et al. v. Becker Estate, 2003 SKQB 195
...(Surr. Ct.), refd to. [para. 11]. Lambert v. Lambert Estate, [1982] S.J. No. 41 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 12]. Tinker's Settlement, Re, [1960] 3 All E.R. 85, refd to. [para. Remnant's Settlement Trusts, Re, [1970] 2 All E.R. 554, refd to. [para. 12]. Zekelman, Re, [1971] 3 O.R. 156 (H.C.), re......
-
Smith v. Royal Trust Corp. of Canada et al., [2003] B.C.T.C. Uned. 792
...Settlement is not part of the law in this province. [9] Counsel also referred to the English case of Re Tinker's Settlement , [1960] 1 W.L.R. 1011 (Ch.). In that case, the court did not permit a variation which purported to add a beneficiary. The English legislation under consideration......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Variation of Trusts: Settlors' Intentions and the Consent Principle in Saunders v Vautier
...ibid, at 251–252.37 ibid, at 251.38 eg Re CL [1969] 1 Ch. 587, 599–600; Re T [1964] 1 Ch 158, 162; contrast Re Tinker’s Settlement[1960] 1 WLR 1011, 1013.39 Re CL [1969] 1 Ch 587.40 In Re Remnant’s Settlement Trusts [1970] 1 Ch 560, it was held that there was a moral benefit instriking out ......