Re W and B v H (Child Abduction: Surrogacy)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
Foyle Health Trust v E.C.
...ART 15 EEC REG 2201/2003 ART 15(2)(a) B v H (HABITUAL RESIDENCE: WARDSHIP) 2002 1 FLR 388 W & B v H (CHILD ABDUCTION: SURROGACY) 2002 1 FLR 1008 HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION ART 12 M (C) v DELEGACION PROVINCIAL DE MALAGA 1999 2 IR 363 1999 2 ILRM 103 ......
-
Re G (Abduction: Withdrawal of Proceedings, Acquiescence, Habitual Residence)
...exception to be recognised in the case of new born children. However, I would also observe that, as pointed out by Hedley J W & B v H (Child Abduction: Surrogacy) [2002] 1 FLR 1008 at paras [21] – [23] and repeated by him in Re F (Abduction: Unborn Child) [2007] 1FLR 627 at para [12], while......
-
A v A (Children: Habitual Residence)
...s 41 (albeit that it has been held that this does not apply as between the United Kingdom and other countries: Re S (A Child: Abduction) [2002] EWCA Civ 1941, [2003] 1 FLR 1008) and Regulation, article 10 (see para 23 above). As Lord Hughes points out, article 10 provides a good reason why ......
-
Za and Pa v Na
...habitual residence is not to be treated as necessarily the same as that of his parents. This was Hedley J's concern in W. and B. v H. (Child Abduction: Surrogacy) [2002] 1 FLR 1008. I differ from him only in saying that I cannot at the moment envisage any case involving a child who is born......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
When a Single Man Wants to Be a Father: Revealing the Invisible Subjects in the Law Regulating Fertility Treatment
...For example, TT (A Minor) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam); W. and B. v. H. (Child Abduction:Surrogacy) [2002] 1 FLR 1008; JP v LP & Others [2014] EWHC 595 (Fam).18. Birmingham Children’s NHS Trust v B & C [2014] EWHC 531 (Fam) and earlier: Re W (AMinor) (Medical Treatment: Court’s Jurisdiction) [1993]......