Re Wait
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1927 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
47 cases
- Henriques and Another v United Dominion Corporation (JA) Ltd
- JRI Resources Sdn Bhd v Kuwait Finance House (M) Bhd (President of Association of Islamic Banking Institutions Malaysia and Another, interveners)
-
Borealis AB v Stargas Ltd
...over to them. Such endorsements were ineffective to pass the legal title in part of an undivided whole to a purchaser. (In re Wait [1927] 1 Ch 606: See now the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1995.) Further, the practice of issuing delivery orders for parcels out of a bulk cargo were similar......
-
John Hall (in his own right and as assignee of 1st Class Legal (IS) Ltd) v Saunders Law Ltd
...them a fiduciary character would (as it seems to their Lordships) have adverse consequences far exceeding those foreseen by Atkin LJ in In re Wait [1927] 1 Ch 606. It is possible without misuse of language to say that the customers put faith in the company, and that their trust has not bee......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
OF PROHIBITIONS ON ASSIGNMENTS, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND NEGATIVE PLEDGES IN COMMERCIAL LAW: CLOGS ON COMMERCE
...104 Tailby v Official Receiver (1888) 13 App Cas 523. See also PS Atiyah, The Sale of Goods (1990, 8th ed) at 317. Cf Re Wait[1927] 1 Ch 606. Although it may be that where consideration is furnished, the equitable doctrine is not dependant on specific performance; cf Holroyd v Marshall(1862......
-
THE CASE AGAINST THE EQUITABLE LIEN.
...(n 3) 119-20. (12) Re Stucley; Stucley v Kekewich [1906] 1 Ch 67, 84 (Cozens-Hardy LJ). See also Campbell (n 3) 100. (13) Re Wait [1927] 1 Ch 606, 635-6 (Atkin LJ). Atkin LJ argued that the Sale of Goods legislation constituted a complete code, and thus impliedly excluded any general law re......
-
Reforming Directors’ Duties
...DF paras 3.15, 3.82. The statement is not intended to be exhaustive outside its stated field: see thesimilar arguments in Re Wait [1927] 1 Ch 606 in relation to the then current Sale of Goods Act.116 DF paras 3.37–3.73.117 By contrast, the Law Commission was of the view that a general statu......
-
THE SALE OF GOODS (AMENDMENT) ACT 1996: SATISFACTORY QUALITY, AN UNDIVIDED SHARE IN A BULK AND OTHER AMENDMENTS
...terms. See supra n 16 at paras 4.4 and 4.5. No reform was proposed in this area. 54 A well known early example is in the case of Re Wait[1927] 1 Ch 606. 55 See The Gosforth, supra n 52. 56 Of the traders consulted by the Law Commission, 85% stated that they purchased goods, both by land and......