Re Walton (T. D.) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1966
Year1966

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Marley Tile Company Ltd v Burrows
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 February 1977
  • Engineering Industry Training Board v Samuel Talbot (Engineers) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 December 1968
    ...325(1), proviso (a) of the Act, in In re Eros Films Ltd. (1963 1 Ch. 565) at pages 574-575. Contrariwise, in Re ( T.D. Walton, Ltd. 1966 1 W.L.R. 869) Mr. Justice Plowman said that section 326(2) must be construed strictly. But that was unnecessary for his decision. Suffice it that it was p......
  • Jamaica Export Credit Insurance Corporation v Alcron Development Ltd et Al
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 4 December 1991
    ...therefore entitled to retain the benefit of the execution. He cited section 300 of the Companies Act, as well as Re: T.D. Walton Ltd. [1966] 2 All E.R. 157. Reliance was also placed on Re: Grosvenor Metal Co. Ltd. [1950] 1 Ch. D. 63 and Re: Memco Engineering Ltd [1985] 3 All E.R. 267 at p. ......