Re Whiting. Ormond v De Launay
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1913 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Grealey v Sampson
...1 Ch. 726, at p. 734. (1) 12 M. & W. 591. (2) [1893] 1 Ch. 101. (3) 23 Ch. D. 218. (4) W. N. 1909, p. 59. (1) 53 Sol. Journal 673. (2) [1913] 2 Ch. 1, at p. 5. (3) [1904] 1 Ch. 726, 734. (4) L. R. 4 Eq. 200; L. R. 3 Ch. 501. (5) 2 M. & S. 5. (1) [1895] 1 I. R. 346. (2) 11 C. B. N. S. 341. (......
-
ADG (executor and trustee of the estate of B (alias C), deceased) v ADH and another (D and others, interveners)
...should be distributed amongst the three surviving brothers as residuary legatees following Re Rhoades [1885] 29 Ch D 142 and Re Whiting [1913] 2 Ch 1. Similarly, Mr Yeo and Dr Raman also conclude that the cl 9(j) gift “falls into residue” upon lapsing; it becomes part of the residuary estat......
-
ADG (executor and trustee of the estate of B (alias C), deceased) v ADH and another (D and others, interveners)
...should be distributed amongst the three surviving brothers as residuary legatees following Re Rhoades [1885] 29 Ch D 142 and Re Whiting [1913] 2 Ch 1. Similarly, Mr Yeo and Dr Raman also conclude that the cl 9(j) gift “falls into residue” upon lapsing; it becomes part of the residuary estat......
-
Re Hogan and Marnell's ContrAct
...[1919] 1 I. R. 187. (1) 7 Cl. & F. 795. (2) [1917] 1 I. R. 286. (3) [1895] 1 I. R. 346. (4) [1893] 1 Ch. 101. (5) [1904] 1 Ch. 726. (1) [1913] 2 Ch. 1. (2) [1904] 1 Ch. (1) [1910] 1 Ch. 43. ...