Re Wigfull & Sons' Trade Mark
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1919 |
| Year | 1919 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Emmanuel Fatima Adams Appellant v Randolph B. Russel & Felix Alexander Respondents [ECSC]
...1104 in which the learned judge cited a passage from the judgment of Swinfen Eady M.R. in the case of Re J. Wigfull & Sons' Trade Marks (1919) 1 Ch 52 which reads: "It is not enough to say the time has expired; it expired more than two years ago, and thereforeI cannot appeal without the tim......
-
Havbell DAC v Flynn
...Borrer v Berkeley [1945] 1 Ch 1 but it in turn refers extensively to that Court's earlier decision in In re Wigfull & Sons Trade Marks [1919] 1 Ch 52 and it is to that decision that I first 24 In In re Wigfull the High Court had directed the removal of certain trade marks from the Register......
-
Carson v Carson
...whether or not to grant a party leave to appeal out of time. As put succinctly by Sir C. SwinfenEady M.R. in Wigfull & Sons Trade Marks, 1919 1 Ch.52,59 "the court has power to enlarge the time if it is just to do so". Some of the relevant considerations, moreover, are referred to in the ju......
-
Greig Middleton & Company Ltd v Denderowicz
...I make these remarks because I wish that there should be no doubt as to the general principle." 7.8 In In re J Wigfull & Son' Trade Marks [1919] 1 Ch 52 Neville J at first instance had rectified the register, removing the respondents' trade mark. Three years later the Court of Appeal dissen......
Request a trial to view additional results