Re Yolland, Husson & Birkett Ltd Leicester v Yolland, Husson and Birkett Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Re Lin Securities (Pte)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • Invalid date
  • R v Registrar of Companies, ex parte Esal (Commodities) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 July 1985
    ...1948. Under the latter Act the scheme is set out in Part III. 12 THE JUDICIAL HISTORY 13In 1908 in Re Yolland, Husson and Birkett Ltd. (1908) 1 Ch. 152 this court had to consider the consequences in law of the scheme for the registration of mortgages and charges set up in the 1900 Act and ......
  • Re City Securities Pte
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 April 1990
    ...(refd) Waters v Windows [1984] VR 503 (refd) Wrightson v McArthur & Hutchinsons [1921] 2 KB 807 (refd) Yolland, Husson & Birkett,In re [1908] 1 Ch 152 (refd) Yorkshire Woolcombers Association,Re [1903] 2 Ch 284 (refd) Companies Act (Cap 50,1988Rev Ed)s 131 (consd);s 137 Companies Act 1900 (......
  • Exeter Trust Ltd v Screenways Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 May 1991
    ...judgments of Harman and Russell L.JJ. Harman L.J., after reviewing the earlier decisions starting with re Yolland, Husson & Birkett Ltd [1908] 1 Ch. 152, continued [1971] Ch., 469H: "The whole point of creating the register under section [395] is to give security to persons relying on the c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Reforming Non‐Possessory Secured Transactions Laws: A New Strategy?
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 78-4, July 2015
    • 1 July 2015
    ...this matter is abundant; see, for instance, Re Cardiff Workmen’s Cottage Co Ltd [1906]2 Ch 627; and Re Yolland, Husson and Birkett Ltd [1908] 1 Ch 152. More recently, see Smith vBridgend County Borough Council [2002] 1 AC 336.78 Although criticised, this idea led to considering pre-2013 reg......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT