Read v Anderson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 cases
  • John Reilly (Claimant/Appellant) v National Insurance and Guarantee Corporation Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 December 2008
  • Perry v Barnett
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Khodari v Tamimi
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 October 2009
    ...courts' strict construction of the Act of 1845 illumined the potential for its evasion. In particular this court held by a majority in Read v. Anderson (1884) 13 QBD 779 that, if a losing bet had been made through an agent, the agent who paid the winner could recover from his principal, the......
  • C.H.T. Ltd v Ward
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 7 November 1963
    ...18 of the Gaming Act, 1845. 13 The Act of 1892 was, it appears, passed to undo the effect of the criticised decision of this court in Read v. Anderson (1884) 13 Queen's Bench page 779, where a commission agent was held entitled to recover a lost bet from his principal, despite the 1845 Act.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT