Red Sea Tankers Ltd v Papachristidis (Hellespont Ardent)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1997
Year1997
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
6 firm's commentaries
  • High Court Dismisses Quincecare Duty Claim Giving Guidance On The Scope And Nature Of The Duty
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • June 24, 2022
    ...misconduct". Both sides agreed that the leading authority on what is required to prove gross negligence is The Hellespont Arden [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep 547, in which the court summarised the standard as "'Gross' negligence is clearly intended to represent something more fundamental than failur......
  • Bermuda's Private Equity Sector: Getting The Deal Through
    • Bermuda
    • Mondaq Bermuda
    • April 4, 2016
    ...Bda LR 8 in which the Bermuda Supreme Court adopted the definition of gross negligence given in Red Sea Tankers v Papachristidis Ltd [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep 547). 8 Other special issues or Are there any other special issues or requirements particular to private equity fund vehicles formed in y......
  • Gross negligence revisited
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • January 13, 2020
    ...of a counterparty constitutes gross negligence faces a high bar. Footnotes 1 [2019] WASC 439. 2 Red Sea Tankers Ltd v Papachristidis [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep 547. 3 [1997] 2 All ER 4 [2019] NSWSC 527. 5 at paragraph 306. 6 at paragraph 307. 7 at paragraph 311. 8 [1999] QCA 516. The content of t......
  • Grossing Up Your Exclusion Clause: The Devil In The Detail
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • November 12, 2007
    ...of the higher term has been considered in the United Kingdom High Court decision of Red Sea Tankers Ltd and Others v Papchristidis [1997] 2 Lloyds Rep 547 (the Hellespont In this case, the agreement was expressed to be subject to the laws of New York (which made it perfectly normal to inclu......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • English Law's Epistemology of Expert Testimony
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley Journal of Law and Society No. 33-4, December 2006
    • December 1, 2006
    ...are not reliable authorities on past mental states,58679 Liddell v. Middleton [1996] P.I.Q.R. P36, 40±41.80 The Hellespont Ardent [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 547, 598; see, also, Barings p.l.c. v.Coopers & Lybrand [2001] Lloyd's Rep. Bank. 85, paras. 37±8.81 P. Roberts, `Will You Stand Up In Cour......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT