Rede v Farr
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1817 |
| Year | 1817 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Toepfer (Alfred C.) v Cremer
...own wrong" so as to get out of paying more damages. That they cannot be allowed to do. No man can take advantage of his own wrong, see Rede v. Farr (1817) 6 M. & S. 121. It is again kind of estoppel. 49 3. DATE OF DEFAULT 50 Clause 26 says that "in the event of default by sellers entitling ......
-
Alghussein Establishment v Eton College
...that a contracting party will not in normal circumstances be entitled to take advantage of his own breach as against the other party. In Rede v. Farr (1817) 6 M. & S. 121, Lord Ellenborough C.J. said, at pp. 124-125: "In this case, as to this proviso, it would be contrary to an universal pr......
- Harmsworth Pension Funds Trustees Ltd v Charringtons Industrial Holdings Ltd
-
Goudriaan v Jenda Corporate Holdings Ltd
...... . . 35 In Levison, the authors cite the reference in Rede v. Farrar [1817] 6 M and S, p. 121 by Lord Ellenborough, to a: - ‘universal principle of law that a party shall never take ......
Request a trial to view additional results