Rederiaktiebolaget Amphitrite v The King

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1921
Date1921
CourtKing's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
60 cases
  • Robertson v Minister of Pensions
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Cape Town City v South African National Roads Agency Ltd and Others
    • South Africa
    • 30 September 2015
    ...Pty (Ltd) v Commonwealth [1977]HCA 71 ((1977) 139 CLR 54; (1977) 17 ALR 513 (HC)): compared.EnglandRederiaktiebolaget Amphitrite v R [1921] 3 KB 500: compared.StatutesThe Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989, ss 21 and 22: see Juta’sStatutes of South Africa 2014/15 vol 6 at 3-22–3-23The ......
  • Tito v Waddell (No. 2); Tito v Attorney General; Ocean Island (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Vandervell and Co. [1936] 1 K.B. 399, C.A. (2) The 1913 agreement Cooper v. Stuart (1889) 14 App.Cas. 286, P.C. Rederiaktiebolaget Amphitrite v. The King [1921] 3 K.B. 500. (3) The 1931 transaction Attorney-General v. De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd. [1920] A.C. 508, H.L.(E.). Burdick v. Garric......
  • R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 July 2005
    ... ... The Claimant also made reference to the well known case of Redereaktiebolaget Amphitrite v The King [1921] KB 500 establishing the proposition that the Crown cannot by contract fetter ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Government Contracts in South Africa: Constructing the Framework
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...ation. See Bolton Th e Law of Governmen t Procurement 74.55 Baxter Administrat ive Law 419.56 Rederiakt iebolaget Amphitrite v the Ki ng [1921] 3 KB 500 503. Endorsed in South Af rica in Sachs v Donges 1950 2 SA 265 (A) and then more di rectly in Fellner v Mini ster of the Interior 1954 4 S......