Reduction and Cancellation of Awards
Author | Andrew Bano |
Pages | 91-98 |
Chapter 11
Reduction and Cancellation of Awards
ABATEMENT
Abatement in respect of third party compensation
11.1 In order to prevent duplication of benefits for the same injury, article 52(1) of the SPO 2006 allows the Secretary of State to take into account against any pension or gratuity
(a) any periodical or lump sum payment in respect of the disablement or death of any person, or in respect of any injury, disease or incapacity sustained or suffered by any person, being a payment—
(i) for which provision is made by or under any enactment, Order in Council (including this Order), Warrant, Order, scheme, ordinance, regulation or other instrument; or
(ii) which is recoverable as damages at common law; or
(b) any periodical or lump sum payment which, in the opinion of the Secretary of State, is recoverable or payable—
(i) under any enactment, scheme, ordinance, regulation or other instrument whatsoever promulgated or made in any place outside the United Kingdom, or
(ii) under the law of any such place
92 War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation – Law and Practice
and is analogous to any payment falling within subparagraph (a) of this paragraph; or
(c) any periodical or lump sum payment made in settlement or composition of, or to avoid the making of, any claim to any payment falling within subparagraph
(a) or (b) of this paragraph, whether liability on any such claim is or is not admitted.
11.2 These provisions are used to abate the amount of war pension which would otherwise be payable to a beneficiary to take into account damages recovered in a civil claim arising out of the accident which has caused the injury in respect of which compensation is payable. However, because of the complex interaction between war pension benefits, social security benefits and common law damages, the application of the abatement provisions is often complicated and difficult.
Ministry of Defence policy
11.3 The relevant paragraphs of the former Ministry of Defence policy on abatement in respect of third party compensation are set out in the decision of Judge Rowland in AL v Secretary of State for Defence (at [10]).
11.4 On the basis of an analysis of the relevant statutory regimes, Judge Rowland doubted in AL v Secretary of State for Defence
To continue reading
Request your trial