Reeman v Department of Transport
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Walsh v South Tipperary County Council
...Tribunal [2005] IESC 66, [2006] 2 IR 191, Sunderland v Louth County Council [1990] ILRM 658 and Reeman v Department of Transport [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep 648 distinguished - Damages awarded (2009/3565P - Clarke J - 9/12/2011) [2011] IEHC 503 Walsh v South Tipperary County Council Facts: A mis......
- Todd v Adams (t/a Trelawney Fishing Co) [QBD (Admiralty)]
-
Commissioners of Customs & Excise v Barclays Bank Plc [QBD (Comm)]
...imposed or, as the case may be, declined to impose a duty of care. This supplementation has been explained by Phillips LJ. in Reeman v. Department of Transport [1993] PNLR 618 at page 625: "When confronted with a novel situation the court does not … consider these matters [foreseeability, p......
-
Gwilliam v West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust and Others
...whose act or omission can be said to have caused it. The default position is that he is not." Similarly, Lord Phillips MR in Reeman v Department of Transport [1997] 2 Ll. Rep. 648, 677, explained the effect of Lord Bridge's seminal speech in Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605, 617,......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Waiting for Enron: The Unstable Equilibrium of Auditor Independence Regulation
...attributable to a reasonable personin such a position ([1990] 2 A.C. 605, 638 per Lord Oliver).68 Reeman v. Department of Transport [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 648, per Lord Bingham,685.69 Morgan Crucible Co. Plc v. Hill Samuel & Co. Ltd [1991] Ch. 295.70 On an irrational deterrent effect, see te......
-
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control: Negligent Rule‐Making in the Court of Appeal
...Yuen Kun Yeu, n 33 above; Rowling vTakaro Properties Ltd [1988] AC 473; XvBedfordshire, n 23 above; Reeman vDepartment of Transport [1997] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 648.64 Indeed, Brodie treats the case as one involving public authority liability: n 14 above, 16.65 In Perrett, n 7 above, see Hobhouse L......