Reeves v Thrings & Long
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
-
Anwar Patrick Adrian v Ng Chong & Hue LLC
...4 SLR (R) 129; [2004] 4 SLR 129 (refd) Reeves v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 (refd) Reeves v Thrings&Long [1996] PNLR 265 (folld) Robinson v PEJones (Contractors) Ltd [2012] QB 44; [2011] BLR 206 (refd) Ross v Caunters [1980] Ch 297 (refd) See Toh Siew Kee v Ho A......
-
Luffeorm Ltd v Kitsons Llp
...after accepting instructions to go beyond those instructions by proffering unsought advice on the wisdom of the transaction"; and in Reeves v Thrings & Long [1996] P&LR 265 Sir Thomas Bingham MR said at page 275 in a dissenting Judgment:- "It will always be relevant to consider what the sol......
-
Carleton (Earl of Malmesbury) v Strutt & Parker (A Partnership)
...one, ….' The authorities show that the manner in which the line is drawn is very much dependent on the facts of the situation. In Reeves v Thrings & Long [1996] PNLR 265 Bingham MR stated at 275: 'As Salmon LJ pointed out in Sykes v Midland Bank Executor and Trustee Co. Ltd [1971] 1 QB 113 ......
-
Wellesley Partners LLP v Withers LLP
...& Co [1987] 1 WLR 916 at 922E per Bingham LJ); or to draw a client's attention to any "hidden pitfall" a contract might contain ( Reeves v Thrings & Long [1996] PNLR 265 at 275 per Sir Thomas Bingham MR). But it is not the general duty of a solicitor to give advice on matters of business ( ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Professional standards in conveyancing searches
...v Gould & Swayne [1996] PNLR 130, Hayes v Dodd [1990] 2 All ER 815. 17 Tucker v Allen [2001] PNLR 37. See also Reeves v Thrings&Long [1996] PNLR 265 per Sir Thomas Bingham, finding negligence for failure to explain inadequacy of access from hotel to its car park. 18 Strover v Harrington [19......