Reigate v Union Manufacturing Company (Ramsbottom) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date1918
Year1918
Date1918

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
235 cases
7 books & journal articles
  • General Principles of Interpretation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Interpretation of Agreements
    • 4 August 2020
    ...it is 193 Williams, above note 171. 194 (1889), LR 14 PD 64. 195 Ibid at 68. 196 See, for example, Reigate v Union Manufacturing Co , [1918] 1 KB 592 at 605 (CA), Scrutton LJ [ Reigate ]. 197 Above note 169. 198 Ibid at 775 [emphasis added]. 199 Conversely, however, it was observed in R v M......
  • CONTRACT LAW IN COMMONWEALTH COUNTRIES: UNIFORMITY OR DIVERGENCE?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, January - December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...724 at [63]. 68 See Andrew Phang, “Implied Terms, Business Efficacy and the Officious Bystander – A Modern History” [1998] JBL 1. 69 [1918] 1 KB 592 at 605. 70 See Andrew Phang, “Implied Terms, Business Efficacy and the Officious Bystander – A Modern History” [1998] JBL 1 at 21. 71 See Andr......
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2000, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...that is the main case law support for the approach from complementarity, viz, Reigate v Union Manufacturing Company (Ramsbottom), Limited[1918] 1 KB 592 at 605 (see also Phang, “Implied Terms, Business Efficacy and the Officious Bystander - A Modern History”[1998] JBL 1, especially at 22—23......
  • Implied Terms in Undisclosed Agency
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 84-3, May 2021
    • 1 May 2021
    ...rules34 which should23 ibid at [23], and see also The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64, 68; Reigate vUnion Manufacturing Co(Ramsbottom) Ltd [1918] 1 KB 592, 605; Shirlaw vSouthern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB206, 227.24 ibid at [26],[76]. In TrumpInternational Golf Club Scotland Ltd vScottish M......
  • Get Started for Free