Repleg. per Richard Holt v Will. Roper le Case fuit que I. Abbe de Westm
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
360 cases
-
Bremer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Vanden Avenne-Izegem PVBA
...This point is perhaps allied to the "buying afloat" point. About 28 June 1973 the sellers received 90 m.t. of sbm. on bills of lading dated 4 and 6 June shipped per theHenning Oldendorf. These they appropriated to outstanding commitments. The buyers claim that the sellers could have appropr......
-
Woods v Multi-Sport Holdings Pty Ltd
...to use it and also of providing for its maintenance and hygiene; (5) the contemporary introduction of such protections in other sports and (6) the special need for them in indoor cricket having regard to the confined space of the field, the high pace of the game and the particularly dangero......
-
R v Hughes
...corporations power156; (5) the powers in relation to trade and commerce with other countries and amongst the States and external affairs157; and (6) the implied nationhood power, being that which facilitates national cooperation and coordination of governmental activities in response to the......
-
Commissioner of Taxation v Citylink Melbourne Ltd
...for the grant of certain rights during the concession period which commenced on 4 March 1996 and continued until ‘the date which is 33 years and 6 months after the Link Expected Completion Date’ (‘the Expiry Date’). The ‘Link Expected Completion Date’ was 14 July 2000, so the concession per......
Get Started for Free