En Replevin le Case fuit que Archevesque de York per Indenture confirme, Company a un

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Common Pleas
Judgment Date01 January 1664
Date01 January 1664

English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 325


En Replevin le Case fuit que Archevesque de York per Indenture confirme, &c. a un

XIX. En Replevin le Case fuit que Archevesque de York perjlndenture confirme, &o. a un Tho. Wyrye pur 80. ana rendant annuelment al dit Evesque & sea succeaaors 24 1. &c. al feasts de Saint Michael & Annunciation nostre Dame per equal portions, Proviso quod in tempora vacation is Archiepiscopatua Ebor. prsedicti redditus pro & secundum ratam temporis vacatiouis erunt aoluti capitulo Ecelesise Cathedralis Eborura ut in jure suo, durante quolibet tempore talis vacationis, & apres le Archevesque devient void & le rate d$l rent nient paye al Chapter, novel Evesque eat consecrate que enter de avoider le Lase pur le cause avantdit, & fuit agree que cest proviso est void pur divers causes, un pur ceo que neat rent al Chapter & il remain rent due al Roy durant le vacation, & apres it va oue le Reversion, & pur ceo le proviso est...

To continue reading

Request your trial
200 cases
  • Ward (Alexander) & Company Ltd v Samyang Navigation Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 April 1975
    ...2 The interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary (of the 6th July 1973) was pronounced folowing upon a preliminary proof which took place on the 8th and 9th February 1973. That preliminary proof was restricted to the matters raised by the defenders' fourth plea-in-law. That plea was as follows:— "Th......
  • John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Gacic
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 June 2007
    ...of specific imputations even when the imputations do no more than restate verbatim the defamatory matter or part of it (Defamation Act ss 7A and 9)172. Once, as happened here, the antecedent legal questions that the relevant matter was capable of carrying the imputations complained of, and ......
  • Rural Press Ltd v Accc;Accc v Rural Press Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 December 2003
    ...48 and 96-100, removed from s 45 by s 45(5)(c)). A third is that type of exclusive dealing known as third line forcing (s 47(6), (7), (8)(c) and (9)(d)). Another is taking advantage of a substantial degree of market power for prohibited purposes (s 46). Yet another is the prohibition agains......
  • Petkoska v Kennedy Cleaning Services Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 31 August 2000
    ...it is necessary to set out the relevant provisions in order to understand the appellant's arguments. Those provisions appear in ss 9, 9A and 9B of the Act. Relevantly, s 9 states: ‘(1) Where – (a) a worker contracts a disease or suffers an aggravation, acceleration or recurrence of a diseas......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT