En Replevin le Case fuit que Archevesque de York per Indenture confirme, Company a un
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
133 cases
-
Ward (Alexander) & Company Ltd v Samyang Navigation Company Ltd
...2 The interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary (of the 6th July 1973) was pronounced folowing upon a preliminary proof which took place on the 8th and 9th February 1973. That preliminary proof was restricted to the matters raised by the defenders' fourth plea-in-law. That plea was as follows:— "Th......
-
Petkoska v Kennedy Cleaning Services Pty Ltd
...it is necessary to set out the relevant provisions in order to understand the appellant's arguments. Those provisions appear in ss 9, 9A and 9B of the Act. Relevantly, s 9 states: ‘(1) Where – (a) a worker contracts a disease or suffers an aggravation, acceleration or recurrence of a diseas......
-
Roncevich v Repatriation Commission
...evidence and the competing contentions, the Tribunal said this7: ‘The Tribunal finds that on the evening of 27 February 1986, between 4.30pm and 9.00pm, the applicant attended the sergeants mess at the Holdsworthy Army Base to socialise with fellow NCOs. They drank alcoholic beverages, ate ......
-
Rural Press Ltd v Accc;Accc v Rural Press Ltd
...48 and 96-100, removed from s 45 by s 45(5)(c)). A third is that type of exclusive dealing known as third line forcing (s 47(6), (7), (8)(c) and (9)(d)). Another is taking advantage of a substantial degree of market power for prohibited purposes (s 46). Yet another is the prohibition agains......
Get Started for Free