Revlon Inc. v Cripps & Lee Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1980 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
- Iliffe News and Media Ltd v Commissioners for HM’s Revenue & Customs
-
Pan-West (Pte) Ltd v Grand Bigwin Pte Ltd
...plaintiffs’ golf clubs in the first place. 32 The defendants also relied on the well known decision of Revlon Inc v Cripps & Lee Limited [1980] FSR 85. The plaintiffs sued for the infringement of the registered trade mark, “Revlon Flex”, arising from the importation into the UK of hair sham......
-
Ng Chye Mong Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor
...were not marked with the trade mark. The decision in this case has been upheld by the Court of Appeal in Revlon Inc v Cripps & Lee Ltd [1980] FSR 85 in its application to the Trade Marks Act 1938 where the Court of Appeal held that parallel imports do not infringe the manufacturer`s trade m......
- Sun Ocean (M) Sdn Bhd and Another; Winthrop Products Inc. and Another
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Exhaustion In The UK: IP Law Under Review
...Heidsiek et Cie Monopole SA v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 330, High Court Chancery Division 24. Revlon Inc & Ors v Cripps & Lee Ltd & Ors [1980] FSR 85, Court of Appeal 25. Sony v Saray Electronics [1983] RFSR 302, Court of Appeal 26. Colgate-Palmolive v Markwell Finance Ltd [1989] RPC 497, Court of......
-
Exhaustion In The UK: IP Law Under Review
...Heidsiek et Cie Monopole SA v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 330, High Court Chancery Division 24. Revlon Inc & Ors v Cripps & Lee Ltd & Ors [1980] FSR 85, Court of Appeal 25. Sony v Saray Electronics [1983] RFSR 302, Court of Appeal 26. Colgate-Palmolive v Markwell Finance Ltd [1989] RPC 497, Court of......
-
The parallel importers' defence: how to establish 'consent' of the Australian trade mark owner?
...have consented on a corporate group basis. These facts differ from those in the well known UK trade marks case Revlon v Cripps & Lee [1980] FSR 85 in which companies in the same corporate group were treated as a single functional entity for intellectual property purposes. Justice Gordon......
5 books & journal articles
-
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN SINGAPORE: A GENERAL OVERVIEW1
...proprietor and also as to the identity of the trade mark which has been applied or whose use has been consented to. See Revlon v. Cripps[1980] F.S.R. 85; Winthrop Products v. Sun Ocean[1988] 2 M.L.J. 317; Colgate-Palmolive Ltd. v. Markwell Finance Ltd. [1988] R.P.C. 283; Castrol v. Automati......
-
PARALLEL IMPORTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SINGAPORE
...to UK.). 19 Castrol v. Automotive Supplies. [1983] R.P.C. 315 (CASTROL Motor Oil from Canada to UK.). 20 Revlon Inc. v. Cripps and Lee [1980] F.S.R. 85 (REVLON shampoo from the United States to the UK.). 21 Sony v Saray Electronics [1983] F.S.R. 302 (SONY television sets made for the US. ma......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...its consent to the manufacture and sale of the Japanese goods by Umeda. Support for this view comes from Revlon Inc v Cripps & Lee Ltd[1980] FSR 85 (one of the cases examined by Lai J), where the Revlon trade mark in the US (country of first sale) was registered in the name of the parent co......
-
A Silhouette of Fortress Europe? International Exhaustion of Trade Mark Rights in the EU
...imports inBourjois&Co v. Katzel, 260 U.S. 689 (1923).66. This argument lies behind the UK CourtofAppeal case RevlonInc. v.Cripps&LeeLtd[1980]FSR85. Handled in Rothnie,ParallelImports,25-31. It is apparently also behind the US Supreme Court'sKMartcase to be explained later on.67.Theindepende......
Request a trial to view additional results