Richard Pannel port action de dett v Thomas Nevel Chevalier, que fuit lie en

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1664
Date01 January 1664
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 322

DEL COMMON-BANK

Richard Pannel port action de dett
and
ers Thomas Nevel Chevalier, que fuit lie en

VII. Richard Pannel port action de dett vers Thomas Nevel Chevalier, que fuit lie en Obligacion sur condicion de payer mainder aumme a le Plaintiff al Holt, al jourcertein. Et Sir Thomas Nevel plede que fuit priat a Holt avaundit de aver paye le dit summe & le Plaintiff, &c. ne vient, &c. Et ne dit en le plee q^ est uncore priat, & pur ceo fuit agard d'eatre nul plee mea si fuit d'estre paye a atranger est, &c. P. 3, 4. P. M. Rot. 655.

To continue reading

Request your trial
142 cases
  • Morse v The Police Sc
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 6 Mayo 2011
    ...that the characteristics of conduct and speech that give rise to the offence of disorderly behaviour and other offences under ss 3 and 4(1) and 4(2) have been carefully chosen. The term “offensive behaviour” in s 4(1)(a) accordingly is not to be read as synonymous for other specific charact......
  • Rank Xerox Ltd v Lane
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 Octubre 1979
    ...relevant to the present case fall to be computed in accordance with the principles applicable for capital gains tax. See section 238( 1) and (4)( a) and section 265 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1970. 18 Schedule 7, paragraph 12( c) of the Finance Act 1965 provides that: "No charg......
  • F.P.H. Finance Trust Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 Marzo 1945
    ...and, in a winding up to the whole of the surplus assets after payment to the ordinary shareholders of the amounts paid up on their shares and (4) the ordinary shares became entitled as regards profits (subject to the rights of the holders of the preference shares) to have distributed among ......
  • Banning v Wright
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 Junio 1972
    ...and conditions to those herein contained except this covenant for renewal." 53 The Appellant was willing to agree to numbers 1 and 2 and 4 but not to number 3. He did not wish (as his solicitors intimated in a letter of the 9th October, 1963) "to relinquish his right to" the option of renew......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT