Richards (t/a Colin Richards & Co) v Hughes
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Peter Gibson L.J.,Jacob LJ,Sir William Aldous |
| Judgment Date | 09 March 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWCA Civ 266 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: A3/2003/1911 |
| Date | 09 March 2004 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
141 cases
-
UBS AG v Rose Capital Ventures Ltd
...Procedure 2018 at paragraph 3.4.2 record, the right approach is that indicated by the Court of Appeal in Hughes v Colin Richards & Co [2004] EWCA Civ 266, namely the court must be certain that the claim (or defence) is bound to fail. And even if the court reaches that conclusion based on th......
-
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Condek Holdings Ltd (formerly Condek Ltd) and Others
...admissible claim. 15 For the purposes of these applications I adopt the statement of principle provided by Peter Gibson LJ in Hughes v Colin Richards & Co [2004] EWCA Civ 266. There the Defendant had brought applications under both CPR 3.4 and CPR 24. Although the application under CPR 24 p......
-
Alan Michael Houchin v Lincolnshire Probation Trust
...( Watkins v SSHD [2006] 2 WLR 807). 33 An application to strike out should not be granted unless the claim is bound to fail ( Hughes v. Colin Richards and Co [2004] EWCA Civ 266). In order to defeat a claim for summary judgment it is sufficient for the respondent to show some prospect of su......
-
Rail for London Ltd v The Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Hackney
...should not be granted unless the Court is certain that the claim is bound to fail. He relied on [22] of Hughes v Colin Richards & Co [2004] EWCA Civ 266, a case in which the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against the rejection of a strike-out application. Peter Gibson LJ was dealing i......
Request a trial to view additional results